Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
let & var change
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
let vs var
Created:
7 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
let
let foo = "foo" foo = "bar"
var
var foo = "foo" foo = "bar"
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
let
var
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
I'd be happy to explain the benchmark and its test cases. **What is being tested?** The benchmark measures the performance difference between using `let` and `var` keywords in JavaScript. Both `let` and `var` are used for declaring variables, but they have different scoping behaviors. `let` has block scope, meaning it only applies within the block it's declared inside, while `var` has function scope, applying to the entire surrounding function. **Options compared** The two options being compared are: 1. **`let foo = "foo" \n foo = "bar"`**: This is a variable assignment using `let`, where a new value is assigned to an existing variable. 2. **`var foo = "foo" \n foo = "bar"`**: This is a variable assignment using `var`, also assigning a new value to an existing variable. **Pros and Cons** * **`let`**: + Pros: Block scope, which can help avoid global variables and reduce polluting the global namespace. Also, it's more modern and commonly used in newer JavaScript versions. + Cons: Can't be reassigned with a new value outside its block scope (unless you use `const let` or `let const` for immutable blocks). * **`var`**: + Pros: Can be redeclared with the same name within the same scope, and it's supported by older JavaScript versions. + Cons: Function scope, which can lead to unexpected variable behaviors in large codebases. Also, it's generally considered less modern and more polluting than `let`. **Library usage** There is no explicit library mentioned in the benchmark definition or test cases. However, the browser specified (`Chrome 67`) might be using its own libraries or extensions that are not explicitly declared. **Special JS features or syntax** The benchmark does not explicitly mention any special JavaScript features or syntax being used. The variable assignments and reassignments described are basic and standard JavaScript constructs. **Other alternatives** If you wanted to measure the performance of other JavaScript variables, such as `const`, `function`, or `let const`, you could add additional test cases with different assignments and reassignments. To give a more comprehensive understanding, here's an updated benchmark definition with additional test cases: ```json { "Name": "JavaScript Variable Performance", "Description": null, "Script Preparation Code": null, "Html Preparation Code": null } [ { "Benchmark Definition": "let foo = \"foo\"\r\nfoo = \"bar\"", "Test Name": "let " }, { "Benchmark Definition": "var foo = \"foo\"\r\nfoo = \"bar\"", "Test Name": "var" }, { "Benchmark Definition": "const foo = \"foo\"\r\nfoo = \"bar\"", "Test Name": "const" }, { "Benchmark Definition": "function foo() { foo() }", "Test Name": "function" } ] ``` This updated benchmark would measure the performance of `let`, `var`, `const`, and `function` variables in different scenarios.
Related benchmarks:
var vs. const vs. let
var vs let 111
var vs let vs const init
Reassigning let vs const
let or without let
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?