Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
let & var 2
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
let vs var
Created:
7 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
let
let foo = "foo" foo = "bar"
var
let foo = "foo" foo = "bar"
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
let
var
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.1:latest
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the benchmark test case. **What is being tested?** The benchmark tests two different ways of reassigning a value to a variable in JavaScript: `var` and `let`. **Test Cases** There are two test cases: 1. **"let"**: Assigns a string value "foo" to a variable using the `let` keyword, then reassigns the variable to a new string value "bar". 2. **"var"**: Assigns a string value "foo" to a variable using the `var` keyword, then reassigns the variable to a new string value "bar". **Library or special JS feature used** None in this specific test case. **Options compared** The two options being compared are: 1. **let**: Using the `let` keyword to declare and reassign variables. 2. **var**: Using the `var` keyword to declare and reassign variables. **Pros/Cons of each approach** Both `let` and `var` have their own use cases, but here's a brief summary: * **let**: + Pros: Blocks scope, meaning variables are scoped to the block they're declared in. This can help prevent unexpected variable assignments. + Cons: None significant, as it's generally considered good practice. * **var**: + Pros: Function-level scoping, which means variables are available throughout the entire function. + Cons: Can lead to unexpected behavior due to function-level scoping. In modern JavaScript, `let` is generally recommended over `var`, especially when working with loops or conditional statements. **Other considerations** The benchmark results show a significant difference in execution speed between the two options. The `var` test case executed at approximately 1.23 times the rate of the `let` test case on this specific browser and OS combination. **Alternatives** If you're not using modern JavaScript, you might still be using older syntax. If that's the case, here are some alternatives: * **const**: Use `const` when variables shouldn't change. It's more efficient than `let`. * **function-level scoping with IIFE (Immediately Invoked Function Expression)**: Wrap your code in an IIFE to create a new scope, ensuring local variables don't pollute the global namespace. Keep in mind that these alternatives are generally considered outdated and not as widely supported or maintained as modern JavaScript features.
Related benchmarks:
var vs. const vs. let
var vs let 111
var vs let vs const init
let or without let
let or without let (2)
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?