Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
spread vs concat xxx2
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
concat vs spread
Created:
8 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
concat
var params = [ "hello", true, 7 ]; var other = [ 1, 2 ].concat(params);
spread
var params = [ "hello", true, 7 ] var other = [ 1, 2, ...params ]
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
concat
spread
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.1:latest
, generated one year ago):
Let's dive into the details of this benchmark. **What is being tested?** The benchmark tests two different approaches to concatenate arrays in JavaScript: 1. Using the `concat()` method (`var other = [ 1, 2 ].concat(params);`) 2. Using the spread operator (`...`) (`var other = [ 1, 2, ...params ];`) **What are the options compared?** We're comparing two different ways to concatenate arrays: * **Concat method**: `concat()` is a built-in JavaScript method that takes an array as its argument and returns a new array with the original array's elements followed by the concatenated array. * **Spread operator**: The spread operator (`...`) is a syntax sugar introduced in ECMAScript 2015 (ES6) that allows you to "spread" or unpack an array into separate arguments. **Pros and cons of each approach:** * **Concat method**: + Pros: Well-established, widely supported, and familiar to developers. + Cons: Creates a new array every time it's called, which can lead to performance issues with large arrays. * **Spread operator**: + Pros: A more concise and readable way to concatenate arrays, especially when dealing with multiple sources. Can also be used for other use cases, such as function arguments or object literals. + Cons: Requires support from the JavaScript engine (which is available in modern browsers and Node.js). **Other considerations:** * **Performance**: The benchmark results show that the spread operator outperforms the concat method on this particular test case. However, performance may vary depending on the specific use case, array size, and JavaScript engine. * **Readability**: The spread operator can make code more concise and readable, but it's essential to consider whether the benefits outweigh any potential confusion for developers not familiar with this syntax. **Library and special JS feature usage:** No external libraries are used in this benchmark. However, the test case utilizes the spread operator (`...`), which is a native JavaScript feature introduced in ECMAScript 2015 (ES6). **Alternative approaches:** If you don't want to use either the concat method or the spread operator, other alternatives include: * Using the `push()` method and iterating over the array elements. * Creating a new array using the `Array.from()` method and concatenating it with the original array. * Utilizing a library like Lodash, which provides its own implementation of array concatenation. Keep in mind that these alternative approaches may have their own trade-offs and performance characteristics.
Related benchmarks:
Array.prototype.concat vs Spread operator
Array.prototype.concat vs Spread operator
concat 2 arrays: Array.prototype.concat vs spread operator
ES6 Array concat vs spread operator
Array.prototype.concat vs spread operator 12
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?