Benchmark: jquery vs js - MeasureThat.net

HTML Preparation code:

<script type="text/javascript" src="http://ajax.aspnetcdn.com/ajax/jQuery/jquery-3.1.0.min.js"></script>

Script Preparation code:

var filtres = {
	tramitacio_pdu: true,
	tramitacio_ordinaria: true,
	us_sae: true,
	us_res: true,
	us_mix: true,
	estat_programacio: true,
	estat_produccio: true,
	estat_estoc: true
};
var tramitacio_pdu = true;
var	tramitacio_ordinaria = true;
var	us_sae = true;
var	us_res = true;
var	us_mix = true;
var	estat_programacio = true;
var	estat_produccio = true;
var	estat_estoc = true;

Tests:

variable
filtres.tramitacio_pdu && filtres.tramitacio_ordinaria && filtres.us_sae && filtres.us_res & filtres.us_mix & filtres.estat_programacio && filtres.estat_produccio && filtres.estat_estoc
object
tramitacio_pdu && tramitacio_ordinaria && us_sae && us_res & us_mix & estat_programacio && estat_produccio && estat_estoc

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
variable
object

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

No previous run results

This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one to run it!

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

I'd be happy to help you understand the provided benchmark!

**Overview**

The provided benchmark compares two JavaScript engines: jQuery and native JavaScript (i.e., ES6+ syntax). The benchmark is designed to test the performance of these engines in executing specific JavaScript code. The code is written using a combination of variable declarations and bitwise AND operators.

**Benchmark Definition JSON**

The `Script Preparation Code` section defines a JavaScript object called `filtres` with various properties set to `true`. These properties represent different configuration options for the benchmark. The `Html Preparation Code` section includes a reference to jQuery 3.1.0, which will be used by the benchmark.

**Test Cases**

There are two individual test cases:

1. **"variable"`**: This test case uses the `&&` operator to check if all properties of the `filtres` object are set to `true`.
2. **"object"`**: This test case uses the bitwise AND operator (`&`) and checks if all properties of the `filtres` object are set to `true`.

**Options Compared**

The benchmark compares the performance of two JavaScript engines:

* **jQuery**: Uses the jQuery library, which provides a DOM-based API for manipulating and querying the document.
* **Native JavaScript (ES6+ syntax)**: Executes the provided code using native JavaScript syntax.

**Pros and Cons of Each Approach**

**jQuery:**

Pros:

* Provides a familiar and widely-used API for DOM manipulation.
* Can simplify complex DOM interactions.

Cons:

* Adds overhead due to the library's abstraction layer.
* May introduce performance bottlenecks in certain scenarios.

Native JavaScript (ES6+ syntax):

Pros:

* Executes code natively, without additional overhead from libraries.
* Can take advantage of modern CPU and memory optimizations.

Cons:

* Requires a deeper understanding of native JavaScript syntax and semantics.
* May require additional work to achieve similar functionality as jQuery.

**Library: jQuery**

jQuery is a popular JavaScript library that provides a convenient API for DOM manipulation. In the context of this benchmark, jQuery's DOM-based API may introduce overhead compared to native JavaScript syntax.

However, it's worth noting that jQuery also provides some performance benefits due to its optimized implementation and caching of frequently accessed elements.

**Special JS Feature or Syntax**

The provided code uses bitwise AND operators (`&&` and `&`) in a creative way. This is not a new or special feature, but rather a concise way to chain multiple logical checks together.

**Alternative Benchmarks**

Other benchmarking approaches could include:

* **ES6+ syntax vs. ES5 syntax**: Compare the performance of modern JavaScript syntax (ES6+) against older syntax (ES5).
* **JavaScript engine vs. interpreted language**: Compare the performance of a JavaScript engine (e.g., V8) against an interpreted language like Python or Ruby.
* **Native JavaScript vs. JIT compiler**: Compare the performance of native JavaScript execution with just-in-time (JIT) compilation and caching.

These alternative benchmarks could provide valuable insights into different aspects of JavaScript performance, such as syntax, engine choice, and optimization strategies.

Related benchmarks:

jquery vs js (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: variable vs object

Created: 7 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

variable

object

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

No previous run results

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):