Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
NumberFormat
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
Instatiate vs formatter
Created:
one year ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
var formatter = new Intl.NumberFormat({ style: 'currency', currency: 'GBP' })
Tests:
Instatiate
new Intl.NumberFormat({ style: 'currency', currency: 'GBP' }).format(1000)
formatter
formatter.format(1000)
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Instatiate
formatter
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
Run details:
(Test run date:
one year ago
)
User agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/134.0.0.0 Safari/537.36
Browser/OS:
Chrome 134 on Linux
View result in a separate tab
Embed
Embed Benchmark Result
Test name
Executions per second
Instatiate
45238.0 Ops/sec
formatter
3214812.5 Ops/sec
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided benchmark and explain what's being tested, compared, and their pros and cons. **Benchmark Overview** The benchmark is measuring the performance of two different approaches for formatting currency values in JavaScript using the `Intl.NumberFormat` API. **Script Preparation Code** ```javascript var formatter = new Intl.NumberFormat({ style: 'currency', currency: 'GBP' }); ``` This line creates a new instance of the `Intl.NumberFormat` class with the following settings: * `style`: specifies the formatting style (in this case, "currency") * `currency`: specifies the currency code (in this case, "GBP" for British Pounds) The purpose of this script is to create a reusable formatter object that can be used throughout the benchmark. **Html Preparation Code** ```javascript null ``` This line indicates that no HTML preparation code is required. This is likely because the benchmark is focused on measuring the performance of the JavaScript code itself, rather than any HTML-related aspects. **Test Cases** There are two test cases: 1. **Instatiate** ```javascript new Intl.NumberFormat({ style: 'currency', currency: 'GBP' }).format(1000) ``` This line creates a new instance of the `Intl.NumberFormat` class with the same settings as before, but then immediately calls the `format()` method on it to format the value `1000`. The purpose of this test case is to measure the performance of creating and instantiating the formatter object. 2. **formatter** ```javascript formatter.format(1000) ``` This line simply calls the `format()` method on the existing formatter object created in the script preparation code. The purpose of this test case is to measure the performance of reusing the pre-created formatter object. **Pros and Cons** * **Instatiate**: + Pros: This approach creates a new formatter object every time, which might be desirable if you want to create multiple formatters with different settings. + Cons: Creating a new object requires more memory and computational resources, which can impact performance. * **formatter**: + Pros: Reusing the pre-created formatter object reduces memory allocation and deallocation overhead, making it faster. + Cons: If you need to use a different formatter setting or value, this approach requires creating a new formatter object, which can be slower. **Library** The `Intl.NumberFormat` API is a part of the JavaScript standard library, introduced in ECMAScript 2015 (ES6). Its purpose is to provide support for formatting numbers according to the conventions of different languages and regions. **Special JS Feature** There is no specific JavaScript feature or syntax being used in this benchmark. However, it's worth noting that the `Intl.NumberFormat` API relies on Unicode character encoding, which can be sensitive to certain characters and encoding schemes. **Other Alternatives** If you don't want to use the `Intl.NumberFormat` API, you could consider alternative approaches for formatting currency values, such as: * Using a library like moment.js or date-fns * Implementing your own custom formatting logic using regular expressions or string manipulation techniques * Using a third-party library like highcharts or chartjs to render currency values However, these alternatives might require more code and customization effort, which could impact performance and maintainability.
Related benchmarks:
Intl.NumberFormat vs toLocalString vs Custom Format vs Pre-created Intl formatter
Intl.NumberFormat vs toLocaleString vs Custom Formatter vs Pre-created Intl formatter
test international
Number.toLocaleString vs Intl.NumberFormat (single instance)
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?