Toggle navigation
MeasureThat
.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Instanceof VS toString for date comparison
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
instanceof vs toString
Created:
one year ago
by:
Guest
Go to the latest result
Tests:
instanceof
'a' instanceof Date
toString
Object.prototype.toString.call('a')
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
instanceof
toString
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
Run details:
(Test run date:
6 months ago
)
User agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/143.0.0.0 Safari/537.36
Browser/OS:
Chrome 143 on Mac OS X 10.15.7
View result in a separate tab
Embed
Embed Benchmark Result
<iframe src="https://measurethat.net/Embed?id=624173" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>
instanceof
89.4M/s
toString
50.6M/s
View exact numbers
Test name
Executions per second
✓
instanceof
89,353,096 Ops/sec
toString
50,576,376 Ops/sec
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's dive into the world of JavaScript microbenchmarks. **What is being tested?** MeasureThat.net is testing two different approaches to compare dates in JavaScript: 1. `instanceof Date`: This approach uses the `instanceof` operator to check if a value is an instance of the `Date` object. 2. `Object.prototype.toString.call('a')`: This approach uses the `toString()` method on the `Object.prototype` and passes a string `'a'` as an argument. **Options being compared** The two options being compared are: * Using the `instanceof` operator to check if a value is a `Date` object * Using the `toString()` method on `Object.prototype` with a string argument **Pros and Cons of each approach:** 1. `instanceof Date`: * Pros: + Directly checks if a value is a `Date` object, which might be more efficient. + Less chance of type coercion errors. * Cons: + Can be slower due to the overhead of creating a new `Date` object for comparison. + Might not work as expected with non-Date values (e.g., strings). 2. `Object.prototype.toString.call('a')`: * Pros: + More flexible and can handle various types of values, including strings and numbers. + Less chance of type coercion errors. * Cons: + Can be slower due to the overhead of calling a method on `Object.prototype`. + Might not work as expected with non-String values (e.g., arrays or objects). **Other considerations:** * Both approaches assume that the input value is a string representation of a date. If the input can be a `Date` object itself, the results might differ. * The `instanceof` operator uses a cached lookup table for performance, which might affect its behavior in certain cases. **Library usage: None** There are no libraries used in these benchmark tests. **Special JavaScript feature or syntax: None** There are no special features or syntax used in this benchmark. It's a straightforward comparison of two approaches. **Other alternatives:** If you need to compare dates, other alternatives might include: * Using the `Date.parse()` method to convert strings to timestamps * Using the `Date.now()` method to get the current timestamp * Using a date parsing library like Moment.js or Luxon In terms of comparing values using the `instanceof` operator and `toString()` method, other approaches might include: * Using the `TypeOf` operator (not available in all browsers) * Using a custom implementation for type checking However, these alternatives are not directly related to the specific benchmark test being discussed.
Related benchmarks
new Date().toISOString() vs new Date().toLocaleString()
Instanceof VS toString for date comparison when using objects
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?