Benchmark: Squaring in javascript2

Tests:

Simple multiplication
let x = 42 * 42;
** operator
let y = 42 ** 2;

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
Simple multiplication
** operator

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: one year ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/128.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 128 on Windows

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
Simple multiplication	263638928.0 Ops/sec
** operator	243423472.0 Ops/sec

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

I'd be happy to explain the benchmark being tested on MeasureThat.net.

**Benchmark Overview**

The benchmark is designed to measure the performance of squaring numbers in JavaScript, specifically using the `*` and `**` operators. The benchmark consists of two individual test cases:

1. **Simple multiplication**: The first test case measures the performance of multiplying 42 by itself.
2. **** operator**: The second test case measures the performance of exponentiation using the `**` operator.

**Options Compared**

The benchmark compares the performance of two different approaches to squaring numbers in JavaScript:

1. **Simple multiplication**: This approach uses the `*` operator to multiply the number by itself, e.g., `let x = 42 * 42;`.
2. **Exponentiation using ****: This approach uses the `**` operator to exponentiate the number, e.g., `let y = 42 ** 2;`.

**Pros and Cons**

Here are some pros and cons of each approach:

* **Simple multiplication**:
	+ Pros: Simple and easy to implement.
	+ Cons: Can be slower than using the `**` operator due to repeated multiplications.
* **Exponentiation using ****: 
	+ Pros: Faster and more efficient, as it only requires a single exponentiation operation.
	+ Cons: May have higher constant factors due to the implementation details of the `**` operator.

**Other Considerations**

The benchmark also considers the performance of each approach on different devices and browsers:

* **DevicePlatform**: The benchmark is run on both desktop and potentially mobile devices, although no specific results are shown for mobile devices.
* **OperatingSystem**: The benchmark is run on Windows, but it's likely that other operating systems will be included in future runs.

**Library and Special JS Features**

There is no library explicitly mentioned in the benchmark definition or test cases. However, some JavaScript engines may use libraries or optimized implementations of operators under the hood.

No special JavaScript features are explicitly mentioned in this benchmark, although some modern JavaScript engines like V8 (used by Google Chrome) have implemented new language features that might affect performance.

**Alternatives**

Some alternative approaches to squaring numbers in JavaScript could include:

* Using a library like Math.js or Exponentiation.js for optimized exponentiation.
* Implementing a custom exponentiation function using bit manipulation or other techniques.
* Using parallel processing or concurrent execution to take advantage of multiple CPU cores.

However, these alternatives are not explicitly mentioned in the benchmark definition and would require additional modifications to the test code.

Related benchmarks:

Squaring in javascript2 (version: 0)

Squaring in javascript

Comparing performance of: Simple multiplication vs ** operator

Created: one year ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

Simple multiplication

** operator

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):