Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Squaring in javascript
(version: 0)
Squaring in javascript
Comparing performance of:
pow function vs ** operator
Created:
one year ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
pow function
let x = Math.pow(42)
** operator
let y = 42 ** 2
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
pow function
** operator
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
Run details:
(Test run date:
one year ago
)
User agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/128.0.0.0 Safari/537.36
Browser/OS:
Chrome 128 on Windows
View result in a separate tab
Embed
Embed Benchmark Result
Test name
Executions per second
pow function
18354490.0 Ops/sec
** operator
238861184.0 Ops/sec
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's dive into the explanation of the provided benchmark. **Benchmark Overview** The website "MeasureThat.net" provides a platform for users to create and run JavaScript microbenchmarks. The provided JSON represents two individual test cases: one using the `Math.pow` function and another using the exponentiation operator (`**`). **Options Compared** In this benchmark, only two options are compared: 1. **`Math.pow(42)`**: This option uses the built-in `Math.pow` function to calculate the square of 42. 2. **`42 ** 2`**: This option uses the exponentiation operator (`**`) to calculate the square of 42. **Pros and Cons** Here's a brief analysis of each approach: 1. **`Math.pow(42)`**: * Pros: More readable, explicit, and maintainable code. It clearly conveys the mathematical operation being performed. * Cons: May be slower due to the overhead of calling a built-in function. 2. **`42 ** 2`**: * Pros: Faster execution, as it's a simple exponentiation operation that can be optimized by the JavaScript engine. * Cons: Less readable, as the exponentiation operator is not immediately clear. **Library and Purpose** The `Math.pow` function is part of the JavaScript standard library, which provides mathematical functions for various operations. In this benchmark, it's used to calculate the square of a number. **Special JS Feature or Syntax** In this benchmark, neither option uses any special JavaScript features or syntax that would affect its interpretation. Both options are relatively straightforward and widely supported across different browsers and environments. **Other Alternatives** If you wanted to test the square of 42 using other approaches, here are some alternatives: 1. **Using a library**: You could use a mathematical library like `mathjs` or `math-expression-evaluator` to calculate the square. 2. **Recursive approach**: You could write a recursive function to calculate the square, e.g., `function square(x) { return x * x; }`. 3. **Using a custom implementation**: You could implement the exponentiation operator from scratch using bitwise operations or other optimization techniques. Keep in mind that these alternatives might not be representative of real-world scenarios, where readability and maintainability are crucial.
Related benchmarks:
Rambda vs. Lodash
Ramda vs. Lodash vs. Rambda
Really simple Ramda vs. Lodash
JS native vs Ramda vs. Lodash
Ramda vs. Lodash vs. Sanctuary
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?