Benchmark: jquery-1.11.0 versus jquery-3.7.1 - 2.0

HTML Preparation code:

<script src="https://code.jquery.com/jquery-1.11.0.min.js"></script>
<script src="https://code.jquery.com/jquery-3.7.1.min.js"></script>
<p id="result-jquery-1"></p>
<p id="result-jquery-3"></p>

Script Preparation code:

function runBenchmark(version, resultElementId) {
  const iterations = 10000; // Número de iterações para o teste
  const container = $('#container');
  container.empty();

  // Cria muitos elementos para manipulação
  for (let i = 0; i < 1000; i++) {
    container.append('<div class="item">Item ' + i + '</div>');
  }

  // Mede o tempo de execução
  const start = performance.now();
  for (let i = 0; i < iterations; i++) {
    $('.item').toggleClass('highlight');
  }
  const end = performance.now();

  // Exibe o resultado
  const duration = end - start;
  document.getElementById(resultElementId).textContent = 
    `Versão ${version} levou ${duration.toFixed(2)} ms para completar ${iterations} iterações.`;
}

Tests:

1.11.0
runBenchmark('1.11.0', 'result-jquery-1');
3.7.1
runBenchmark('3.7.1', 'result-jquery-3');

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
1.11.0
3.7.1

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: one year ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/133.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 133 on Windows

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
1.11.0	120.8 Ops/sec
3.7.1	118.3 Ops/sec

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's dive into the world of JavaScript microbenchmarks!

**Benchmark Definition**

The provided JSON represents a benchmarking test that compares two versions of jQuery: 1.11.0 and 3.7.1. The benchmark is designed to measure the performance difference between these two versions when executing a specific task: toggling the `highlight` class on multiple elements.

**Options Compared**

Two options are compared:

1. **jQuery 1.11.0**: This version of jQuery is approximately 5 years older than jQuery 3.7.1.
2. **jQuery 3.7.1**: This version of jQuery is more modern and has several performance improvements over its predecessors.

**Pros and Cons**

Comparing these two versions allows us to identify potential performance regressions or improvements in newer versions of jQuery. Here are some pros and cons of each option:

* **jQuery 1.11.0**:
	+ Pros: May be optimized for specific use cases, has a smaller codebase.
	+ Cons: Older version with potentially slower performance due to outdated algorithms or implementation details.
* **jQuery 3.7.1**:
	+ Pros: More modern and likely to have performance improvements over older versions.
	+ Cons: Larger codebase, may introduce new overhead or complexity.

**Library: jQuery**

The provided benchmark uses jQuery as a library for DOM manipulation. jQuery is a popular JavaScript library that provides a convenient API for interacting with the Document Object Model (DOM). In this benchmark, jQuery is used to toggle the `highlight` class on multiple elements.

**Special JS Feature/Syntax**

There are no special JS features or syntax mentioned in the provided code. The benchmark uses standard JavaScript features and syntax.

**Other Considerations**

When writing benchmarks like this one, it's essential to consider factors such as:

* **Warm-up phase**: The initial few iterations of a benchmark may not accurately represent the performance of the application.
* **Noise**: Small variations in execution time can skew results. To mitigate noise, multiple runs are often performed and averaged.
* **Hardware differences**: Different hardware configurations can impact benchmark results.

**Other Alternatives**

If you're interested in exploring alternative benchmarking tools or techniques, consider:

* **Benchmark Dot Net**: An open-source framework for writing .NET benchmarks that uses a similar approach to MeasureThat.net.
* **Jest**: A popular testing framework that includes built-in support for benchmarking and can be used for performance comparisons.
* **BenchMark.js**: A JavaScript library specifically designed for writing benchmarks, providing tools for measuring execution time, sampling, and more.

I hope this explanation helps you understand the benchmarking test provided by MeasureThat.net!

Related benchmarks:

jquery-1.11.0 versus jquery-3.7.1 - 2.0 (version: 1)

Comparação entre as versões jquery-1.11.0 e jquery-3.7.1

Comparing performance of: 1.11.0 vs 3.7.1

Created: one year ago by: Registered User

Jump to the latest result

1.11.0

3.7.1

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):