Benchmark: benchmarkname-1123123 123 ds1s1

Script Preparation code:

var c1 = 0x1453dc;
var c2 = 0x228004;

Tests:

1
const result = ((c1 & 0xFF) - (c2 & 0xFF)) ** 2 + ((c1 >> 0x08 & 0xFF) - (c2 >> 0x08 & 0xFF)) ** 2 + ((c1 >> 0x10 & 0xFF) - (c2 >> 0x10 & 0xFF)) ** 2;
2
const result = ((c1 & 0xFF) - (c2 & 0xFF)) * ((c1 & 0xFF) - (c2 & 0xFF)) + ((c1 >> 0x08 & 0xFF) - (c2 >> 0x08 & 0xFF)) * ((c1 >> 0x08 & 0xFF) - (c2 >> 0x08 & 0xFF)) + ((c1 >> 0x10 & 0xFF) - (c2 >> 0x10 & 0xFF)) * ((c1 >> 0x10 & 0xFF) - (c2 >> 0x10 & 0xFF));
3
const r = (c1 >> 0x10 & 0xFF) - (c2 >> 0x10 & 0xFF); const g = (c1 >> 0x08 & 0xFF) - (c2 >> 0x08 & 0xFF); const b = (c1 & 0xFF) - (c2 & 0xFF); const result = r * r + g * g + b * b;
4
const r = (c1 >> 0x10 & 0xFF) - (c2 >> 0x10 & 0xFF); const g = (c1 >> 0x08 & 0xFF) - (c2 >> 0x08 & 0xFF); const b = (c1 & 0xFF) - (c2 & 0xFF); const result = r ** 2 + g ** 2 + b ** 2;
5
const r1 = c1 & 0xFF; const g1 = c1 >> 8 & 0xFF; const b1 = c1 >> 16 & 0xFF; const r2 = c2 & 0xFF; const g2 = c2 >> 8 & 0xFF; const b2 = c2 >> 16 & 0xFF; const r = r1 - r2; const g = g1 - g2; const b = b1 - b2; const result = r * r + g * g + b * b;
6
const r1 = c1 & 0xFF; const g1 = c1 >> 8 & 0xFF; const b1 = c1 >> 16 & 0xFF; const r2 = c2 & 0xFF; const g2 = c2 >> 8 & 0xFF; const b2 = c2 >> 16 & 0xFF; const r = r1 - r2; const g = g1 - g2; const b = b1 - b2; const result = r ** 2 + g ** 2 + b ** 2;
7
const r = (c1 & 0xFF) - (c2 & 0xFF); const g = (c1 >> 8 & 0xFF) - (c2 >> 8 & 0xFF); const b = (c1 >> 16 & 0xFF) - (c2 >> 16 & 0xFF); const result = r * r + g * g + b * b;
8
const r = (c1 & 0xFF) - (c2 & 0xFF); const g = (c1 >> 8 & 0xFF) - (c2 >> 8 & 0xFF); const b = (c1 >> 16 & 0xFF) - (c2 >> 16 & 0xFF); const result = r ** 2 + g ** 2 + b ** 2;
9
const r1 = c1 & 0xFF; const r2 = c2 & 0xFF; const r = r1 - r2; const rm = r / 2; const g = (c1 >> 8 & 0xFF) - (c2 >> 8 & 0xFF); const b = (c1 >> 16 & 0xFF) - (c2 >> 16 & 0xFF); const result = (((512 + rm) * r * r) >> 8) + 4 * g * g + (((767 - rm) * b * b) >> 8);

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: one year ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/127.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 127 on Windows

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
1	2042748.9 Ops/sec
2	1028207.1 Ops/sec
3	2050968.2 Ops/sec
4	2135637.5 Ops/sec
5	2121767.5 Ops/sec
6	2128597.2 Ops/sec
7	2113136.8 Ops/sec
8	2128871.8 Ops/sec
9	2112815.8 Ops/sec

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

I see that we have two benchmark results provided:

**Benchmark Results**

1. `[
    {
        "RawUAString": "...",
        "Browser": "Chrome 127",
        "DevicePlatform": "Desktop",
        "OperatingSystem": "Windows",
        "ExecutionsPerSecond": 2135637.5,
        "TestName": "4"
    },
    ...
]`

2. `[
    {
        "RawUAString": "...",
        "Browser": "Chrome 127",
        "DevicePlatform": "Desktop",
        "OperatingSystem": "Windows",
        "ExecutionsPerSecond": 2128871.75,
        "TestName": "8"
    },
    ...
]`

To answer your question, I'll need more information about what specific aspect of these results you're interested in. However, based on the provided data, here are some observations:

* The `ExecutionsPerSecond` values indicate that Chrome 127 performs well across different test names and executions.
* There is a notable variation in execution rates between different test names (e.g., "4", "8", "6", etc.), which may suggest differences in the benchmarking scenario or implementation.

If you'd like to analyze further, I can try to provide some general insights or suggestions on how to interpret these results.

Related benchmarks:

benchmarkname-1123123 123 ds1s1 (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: 1 vs 2 vs 3 vs 4 vs 5 vs 6 vs 7 vs 8 vs 9

Created: one year ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):