new Date(date) vs new Date(normalizeToLocalDate(date)) 2 (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: new Date(dateTimeISO) vs new Date(normalizeToLocalDate(dateTimeISO)) vs new Date(dateOnlyISO) vs new Date(normalizeToLocalDate(dateOnlyISO))

Created: one year ago by: Registered User
Go to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
Tests:
Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results
  • Test case name Result
    new Date(dateTimeISO)
    new Date(normalizeToLocalDate(dateTimeISO))
    new Date(dateOnlyISO)
    new Date(normalizeToLocalDate(dateOnlyISO))

    Fastest: N/A

    Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:
Run details: (Test run date: one year ago)
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/127.0.0.0 Safari/537.36
Chrome 127 on Mac OS X 10.15.7
View result in a separate tab
new Date(dateOnlyISO)
5.8M/s
new Date(dateTimeISO)
4.3M/s
new Date(normalizeToLocalDate(dateTimeISO))
4.3M/s
new Date(normalizeToLocalDate(dateOnlyISO))
3.0M/s
View exact numbers
Test name Executions per second
✓ new Date(dateOnlyISO) 5,783,702 Ops/sec
new Date(dateTimeISO) 4,279,278 Ops/sec
new Date(normalizeToLocalDate(dateTimeISO)) 4,273,234 Ops/sec
new Date(normalizeToLocalDate(dateOnlyISO)) 2,984,260 Ops/sec

Related benchmarks