Benchmark: sum vs object-hash latest versions

HTML Preparation code:

<script src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/hash-sum@2.0.0/hash-sum.min.js"></script>
<script src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/object-hash@3.0.0/dist/object_hash.min.js"></script>

Script Preparation code:

var context1 = {
  title: 'fish',
  position: 1
}

var context2 = {
  title: 'fish',
  position: 1
}

Tests:

sum
sum(context1) === sum(context2)
object-hash
objectHash(context1) === objectHash(context2)

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
sum
object-hash

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: one year ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/127.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 127 on Linux

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
sum	410952.7 Ops/sec
object-hash	11808.5 Ops/sec

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's dive into the explanation of the provided JSON data.

**What is being tested?**

The test cases are comparing two JavaScript functions: `sum()` and `objectHash()`. These functions are used to calculate the sum or hash value of an object, respectively. The tests aim to determine which function is faster for calculating the sum or hash value of a given object.

**Options compared**

Two options are being compared:

1. **`sum(context)`**: This function calculates the sum of all numeric properties in the `context` object.
2. **`objectHash(context)`**: This function returns a unique hash value for the `context` object.

**Pros and Cons of each approach**

1. **`sum(context)`**:
	* Pros: Simple, straightforward implementation. Fast execution speed due to only iterating over numeric properties.
	* Cons: Only calculates sum of numeric values; may not be suitable for objects with non-numeric properties.
2. **`objectHash(context)`**:
	* Pros: Suitable for all types of objects (including those with non-numeric properties). Provides a unique hash value, which can be useful in various applications (e.g., caching, data deduplication).
	* Cons: May have slower execution speed due to more complex implementation and potential overhead from calculating hash values.

**Library usage**

Two libraries are used in the test:

1. **`hash-sum@2.0.0`**: A library providing an efficient `sum()` function for objects.
2. **`object-hash@3.0.0`**: A library providing a function to calculate unique hash values for objects.

**Special JS feature or syntax**

There is no specific JavaScript feature or syntax being tested in this benchmark. The focus is on comparing the performance of two existing functions.

**Benchmark preparation code**

The `Script Preparation Code` section provides scripts that are executed before running each test case. These scripts define two objects, `context1` and `context2`, which are used as input for the tests.

Individual test cases

Each test case consists of a single benchmark definition in the format "Benchmark Definition" followed by a comparison operator (`===`) between the results of the two functions being tested (in this case, `sum(context1)` and `sum(context2)`, or `objectHash(context1)` and `objectHash(context2)`).

**Latest benchmark result**

The provided JSON data includes the latest benchmark results for both tests. The results show the browser type, device platform, operating system, executions per second (which indicates performance), and test name.

**Alternatives**

Other alternatives for calculating sum or hash values of objects might include:

* Using built-in JavaScript functions, such as `JSON.stringify()` for object hashes.
* Implementing custom optimization techniques for specific use cases.
* Utilizing specialized libraries or frameworks optimized for performance in JavaScript applications.

Related benchmarks:

sum vs object-hash latest versions (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: sum vs object-hash

Created: one year ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

sum

object-hash

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):