Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
string to boolean
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
string to string vs Boolean object
Created:
one year ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
string to string
"true" === "true"
Boolean object
Boolean("true")
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
string to string
Boolean object
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
Run details:
(Test run date:
one year ago
)
User agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 10; SAMSUNG SM-J810G) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) SamsungBrowser/16.0 Chrome/92.0.4515.166 Mobile Safari/537.36
Browser/OS:
Chrome Mobile 92 on Android
View result in a separate tab
Embed
Embed Benchmark Result
Test name
Executions per second
string to string
88353616.0 Ops/sec
Boolean object
533834.5 Ops/sec
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided benchmark and explain what is being tested. **Benchmark Overview** The provided benchmark is designed to measure the performance of different JavaScript approaches for converting strings to booleans. There are two individual test cases: 1. "string to string" 2. "Boolean object" **Test Cases Explanation** ### 1. "string to string" This test case checks how quickly a browser can compare two identical string literals using the `===` operator. ```javascript "true" === "true" ``` The purpose of this benchmark is to evaluate the performance of JavaScript engines in performing simple string comparisons. **Options Compared** In this case, there are no explicit options being compared. The test simply runs a single statement with two identical string literals. **Pros and Cons:** * **Pros**: This benchmark provides a simple and straightforward measure of JavaScript engine performance. * **Cons**: As it only tests a single statement, the results may not accurately represent real-world scenarios that involve more complex code. ### 2. "Boolean object" This test case checks how quickly a browser can create a new Boolean object using the `Boolean()` function. ```javascript Boolean("true") ``` The purpose of this benchmark is to evaluate the performance of JavaScript engines in creating Boolean objects from strings. **Options Compared** In this case, there are no explicit options being compared. The test simply runs a single statement with a string literal passed to the `Boolean()` function. **Pros and Cons:** * **Pros**: This benchmark provides a simple measure of JavaScript engine performance when creating Boolean objects. * **Cons**: As it only tests a single statement, the results may not accurately represent real-world scenarios that involve more complex code. **Library Usage** Neither test case explicitly uses any libraries. However, note that in modern JavaScript, you would typically use the `===` operator to compare values, which is already included in the standard library. **Special JS Feature or Syntax** There are no special features or syntax used in these benchmarks beyond the basic usage of strings and Boolean objects. The tests rely on standard JavaScript language constructs. **Other Considerations** To get a more comprehensive picture of JavaScript engine performance, you might consider adding additional test cases that cover: * More complex string comparisons (e.g., using `includes()`, `startsWith()`, etc.) * Creating and manipulating arrays or objects * Performing arithmetic operations **Alternatives** For measuring JavaScript engine performance, other alternatives include: * JSHint's benchmarking features: Offers a range of benchmarks for different scenarios, including code complexity, variable lookup, and function call overhead. * Benchmark.js: A popular benchmarking library specifically designed for web applications. It supports various test cases, including those related to string comparisons and object creation. These alternatives can provide more comprehensive insights into JavaScript engine performance and help identify areas where optimizations are needed.
Related benchmarks:
Compare splicing methods
ToKebabCase3
Which equals operator (== vs ===) is faster (string vs int)?
Fastest results
toBase62String
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?