Benchmark: Measure iterations

Script Preparation code:

function filter(iterable, predicate) {
    const iter = iterable[Symbol.iterator]();
    
    return {
        [Symbol.iterator]() {
            return this;
        },
        next() {
            let result;
          
          	while (
              !(result = iter.next()).done &&
              !predicate(result.value)
            );
          
          	return result;
        }
    };
}

function* filterGenerator(iterable, predicate){
    for (const value of iterable) {
        if (predicate(value)) {
            yield value;
        }
    }
}

var arr = Array(100).fill(0).map((_, i) => i + 1);
var predicate = (x) => x % 3 === 0 && x % 5 === 0;

Tests:

Loop with conditions
for (const value of arr) { if (predicate(value)) { console.log('foobar'); } }
Iterator
for (const value of filter(arr, predicate) { console.log('foobar'); }
Generator
for (const value of filterGenerator(arr, predicate) { console.log('foobar'); }
.forEach
arr.forEach((x) => predicate(x) && console.log('foobar'));

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
Loop with conditions
Iterator
Generator
.forEach

Measure iterations (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: Loop with conditions vs Iterator vs Generator vs .forEach

Created: one year ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

Loop with conditions

Iterator

Generator

.forEach

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

No previous run results