Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Spread vs Concat
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
Spread vs Concat
Created:
7 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
Spread
arr1 = [1, 2, 4] arr2 = ['a', 'b', 'c'] arr3 = [...arr1, ...arr2]
Concat
arr1 = [1, 2, 4] arr2 = ['a', 'b', 'c'] arr3 = arr1.concat(arr2)
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Spread
Concat
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.1:latest
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the benchmark definition and results. **Benchmark Definition** The benchmark is called "Spread vs Concat" which means it compares two different ways of combining arrays in JavaScript: using the spread operator (`...`) and using the `concat()` method. **Test Cases** There are two test cases: 1. **Spread**: This test uses the spread operator to combine two arrays, `arr1` and `arr2`, into a new array, `arr3`. The code is as follows: ```javascript arr1 = [1, 2, 4] arr2 = ['a', 'b', 'c'] arr3 = [...arr1, ...arr2] ``` The spread operator (`...`) is used to "unpack" the elements of `arr1` and `arr2` into a new array. 2. **Concat**: This test uses the `concat()` method to combine two arrays, `arr1` and `arr2`, into a new array, `arr3`. The code is as follows: ```javascript arr1 = [1, 2, 4] arr2 = ['a', 'b', 'c'] arr3 = arr1.concat(arr2) ``` The `concat()` method takes one or more arrays as arguments and returns a new array that contains all the elements of the original arrays. **Library** No external library is used in this benchmark. **Special JS Feature or Syntax** Yes, the spread operator (`...`) is a special feature in JavaScript that allows you to "unpack" an iterable (such as an array) into a new array. It's a shorthand for creating a new array with all the elements of another array. **Pros and Cons** Here are some pros and cons of using each approach: * **Spread Operator**: + Pros: concise syntax, easy to read. + Cons: may be slower than `concat()` method (as seen in benchmark results). * **Concat Method**: + Pros: often faster than spread operator (as seen in benchmark results), can concatenate multiple arrays at once. + Cons: more verbose syntax, may not be as concise or easy to read. **Other Considerations** In terms of performance, the `concat()` method is generally faster than using the spread operator. However, the difference may not be significant unless you're dealing with very large arrays. Additionally, if you need to concatenate multiple arrays at once, the `concat()` method can be more convenient to use. **Alternatives** If you don't like the spread operator or the `concat()` method, there are other ways to combine arrays in JavaScript: * Using the `push()` method and iterating over each array. * Using a library like Lodash's `union` function. * Using a custom implementation using `Map` or `Set`. However, these alternatives may not be as concise or efficient as using the spread operator or the `concat()` method.
Related benchmarks:
Array.prototype.concat vs Spread operator
Array.prototype.concat vs Spread operator
concat 2 arrays: Array.prototype.concat vs spread operator
ES6 Array concat vs spread operator
Array.prototype.concat vs spread operator 12
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?