Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Spread vs Concat
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
Spread vs Concat
Created:
7 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
Spread
arr1 = [1, 2, 4] arr2 = ['a', 'b', 'c'] arr3 = ['a', 'b', 'c', ...arr]
Concat
arr1 = [1, 2, 4] arr2 = ['a', 'b', 'c'] arr3 = arr1.concat(arr2)
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Spread
Concat
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's dive into the world of JavaScript microbenchmarks on MeasureThat.net. The benchmark being tested is comparing two approaches to concatenate arrays: using the spread operator (`...`) versus concatenating arrays using the `concat()` method. **Spread Operator (Spread vs Concat)** The spread operator is a relatively new feature introduced in ECMAScript 2015. It allows you to expand an array into individual elements, making it easier to create copies of arrays or merge arrays together. In this benchmark, we're testing how fast the browser can execute `arr1 = [1, 2, 4]; arr3 = ['a', 'b', 'c', ...arr1];` versus a traditional concatenation approach. **Concat() Method (Concat)** The `concat()` method is a built-in JavaScript function that takes one or more arrays as arguments and returns a new array containing all the elements from each input array. In this benchmark, we're testing how fast the browser can execute `arr1 = [1, 2, 4]; arr3 = arr1.concat(['a', 'b', 'c']);`. **Pros and Cons** Here are some pros and cons of each approach: Spread Operator (Spread vs Concat): Pros: * More concise and expressive code * Can be faster for large arrays due to the optimized implementation Cons: * Introduced in ECMAScript 2015, making it a relatively new feature * May not work in older browsers or environments that don't support it Concat() Method (Concat): Pros: * Wide compatibility with older browsers and environments * Can be simpler to read and understand for some developers Cons: * Less concise code compared to the spread operator * May require more memory allocation due to the creation of a new array **Library Used: None** In this benchmark, no specific library is being tested. The focus is solely on comparing the performance of two different approaches to concatenate arrays. **Special JavaScript Features/Syntax: Spread Operator (Spread vs Concat)** The spread operator is a relatively recent addition to the JavaScript language and requires ECMAScript 2015 or later to be supported. This means that older browsers may not support it, which could impact the benchmark results. **Other Alternatives** If you're interested in exploring alternative approaches to concatenate arrays, here are a few options: 1. Using `Array.prototype.slice()` to create a new array: `arr3 = arr1.slice(0).concat(['a', 'b', 'c']);` 2. Using `Array.prototype.push()` to add elements to the end of an array: `arr3 = arr1; arr3.push('a', 'b', 'c');` 3. Using a library like Lodash or Underscore.js, which provide more functional programming-style arrays and concatenation methods. However, it's worth noting that these alternatives may not be as efficient or concise as the spread operator or `concat()` method. I hope this explanation helps you understand what's being tested in the MeasureThat.net benchmark!
Related benchmarks:
Array.prototype.concat vs Spread operator
Array.prototype.concat vs Spread operator
concat 2 arrays: Array.prototype.concat vs spread operator
ES6 Array concat vs spread operator
Array.prototype.concat vs spread operator 12
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?