Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Arr clear2
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
Asign vs Set length
Created:
one year ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
Asign
let arr1 = [0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9]; arr1 = [];
Set length
let arr2 = [0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9]; arr2.length = 0;
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Asign
Set length
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
Run details:
(Test run date:
one year ago
)
User agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/126.0.0.0 Safari/537.36
Browser/OS:
Chrome 126 on Mac OS X 10.15.7
View result in a separate tab
Embed
Embed Benchmark Result
Test name
Executions per second
Asign
92586440.0 Ops/sec
Set length
20578932.0 Ops/sec
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
I'll break down the provided benchmark and explain what's being tested, compared, and their pros/cons. **Benchmark Definition** The benchmark definition is a JSON object with minimal information: ```json { "Name": "Arr clear2", "Description": null, "Script Preparation Code": null, "Html Preparation Code": null } ``` This suggests that the benchmark is focused on measuring the performance of JavaScript arrays. However, there's no specific context or description provided. **Individual Test Cases** There are two test cases: ```json [ { "Benchmark Definition": "let arr1 = [0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9];\r\narr1 = [];", "Test Name": "Asign" }, { "Benchmark Definition": "let arr2 = [0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9];\r\narr2.length = 0;", "Test Name": "Set length" } ] ``` These test cases measure the performance of two different ways to clear or manipulate a JavaScript array: 1. **Asign**: Assigns an empty value (`[]`) to an existing array using the assignment operator (`=`). 2. **Set length**: Sets the `length` property of an existing array to 0. **Library and Special JS Features** There are no specific libraries mentioned in the benchmark definition or test cases. However, it's worth noting that both test cases use a common JavaScript syntax feature: **optional chaining (`?.`) is not used**, but rather the assignment operator (`=`) and property access (`arr.length`). **Comparison Options** The two test cases compare the performance of: 1. **Asign**: Assigning an empty value to the array using `arr = []`. 2. **Set length**: Setting the `length` property directly on the array using `arr.length = 0`. **Pros and Cons** Here are some pros and cons for each approach: * **Asign**: + Pros: Simple, straightforward syntax. + Cons: May create a new object reference if `arr1` is not already an empty array (e.g., if it's an object or a non-empty array), leading to garbage collection overhead. * **Set length**: + Pros: Does not create a new object reference and avoids potential garbage collection issues. + Cons: Requires explicit property access (`arr.length = 0`), which might be slower due to the lookup. **Other Alternatives** If you want to test similar scenarios, consider exploring other ways to clear or manipulate arrays: * Using `splice()` instead of assignment (e.g., `arr.splice(0);`) * Using a library like Lodash's `unset()` function * Testing with different array sizes or data types Keep in mind that these alternatives may change the benchmark results and require adjustments to the test code. **Considerations** When running this benchmark, consider the following: * The performance difference between `arr = []` and `arr.length = 0` is likely due to the way JavaScript engines optimize array operations. * Garbage collection overhead might be significant for large arrays or in environments with limited memory resources. * The use of assignment (`arr = []`) vs. property access (`arr.length = 0`) may lead to differences in execution speed, depending on the specific browser and engine implementation. Feel free to ask if you have any further questions or would like more information on this topic!
Related benchmarks:
_.filter vs Array.filter
4Lodash.js vs Native2
flatMap() vs filter()
flatMap() vs filter().map() Bruno 1111
flatMap() vs filter().map() Bruno
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?