Toggle navigation
MeasureThat
.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
lodash vs es6 test1
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
_.eq vs eq
Created:
2 years ago
by:
Guest
Go to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<script src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/lodash@4.17.21/lodash.min.js"></script>
Script Preparation code:
var number1 = 5 var number2 = 3
Tests:
_.eq
_.eq(number1, number2)
eq
number1 === number2
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
_.eq
eq
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
Run details:
(Test run date:
2 years ago
)
User agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/124.0.0.0 Whale/3.26.244.21 Safari/537.36
Browser/OS:
Chrome 124 on Mac OS X 10.15.7
View result in a separate tab
Embed
Embed Benchmark Result
<iframe src="https://measurethat.net/Embed?id=528655" width="100%" height="500px"></iframe>
eq
15.1M/s
_.eq
7.8M/s
View exact numbers
Test name
Executions per second
✓
eq
15,109,259 Ops/sec
_.eq
7,806,948 Ops/sec
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
I'd be happy to explain the benchmark. **What is being tested?** The provided JSON represents a JavaScript microbenchmark that compares two approaches: using the `lodash` library and native JavaScript syntax. The benchmark tests the performance of both methods on simple equality checks between two numbers, 5 and 3 (`number1 === number2`). **Options compared:** There are two options being compared: 1. **_.eq(number1, number2)**: This is a method from the `lodash` library that performs an equality check between two values. 2. **number1 === number2**: This is a native JavaScript syntax for performing an equality check between two values. **Pros and Cons of each approach:** 1. **_.eq(number1, number2)** * Pros: + Can handle more complex comparison scenarios (e.g., comparing objects). + Often provides additional features like equality checking with a custom comparator. * Cons: + Requires an external library (lodash), which can introduce overhead and dependencies. + May not be as efficient as native JavaScript syntax for simple equality checks. 2. **number1 === number2** * Pros: + No external library required, reducing overhead and dependencies. + Typically faster than using a library like lodash for simple equality checks. * Cons: + Only performs basic equality checking and does not handle more complex scenarios. **Other considerations:** When deciding between these two approaches, consider the specific requirements of your use case. If you need to perform complex comparisons or require additional features from the `lodash` library, _.eq may be a better choice. However, for simple equality checks where performance is critical and external dependencies are not necessary, using native JavaScript syntax (`number1 === number2`) might be a better option. **Library:** The `lodash` library is a popular utility library for JavaScript that provides various functions for working with arrays, objects, numbers, strings, and more. The _.eq function in particular is designed to provide a flexible and efficient way to perform equality checks between values. **Special JS feature or syntax:** There are no special JavaScript features or syntax mentioned in the provided benchmark. However, it's worth noting that some modern JavaScript features like async/await, let, and const can be used to simplify code and improve readability, but they do not affect the performance of simple equality checks like this one. **Alternatives:** If you need alternative approaches for similar benchmarks, here are a few options: * Using a different utility library (e.g., `underscore` or `moment`) instead of lodash. * Implementing a custom equality function from scratch using native JavaScript syntax. * Using a different programming paradigm like TypeScript, which can provide additional features and optimizations for equality checks.
Related benchmarks
Native Number vs Lodash toNumber
isNumber vs typeof
lodash vs es6 test
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?