Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Slice vs Splice vs Shift vs Spread syntax
(version: 0)
Compares the speed for removing 2 items from the beginning of an array
Comparing performance of:
array.slice() vs array.splice() vs array.shift() vs Spread syntax
Created:
one year ago
by:
Registered User
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
var array = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8] var itemsToRemove = 2
Tests:
array.slice()
array = array.slice(2)
array.splice()
array.splice(0, itemsToRemove)
array.shift()
for (let i = 0 ; i < itemsToRemove ; i++) array.shift()
Spread syntax
var [one, tow, ...others] = array; array = others;
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (4)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
array.slice()
array.splice()
array.shift()
Spread syntax
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
Run details:
(Test run date:
one year ago
)
User agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/125.0.0.0 Safari/537.36
Browser/OS:
Chrome 125 on Windows
View result in a separate tab
Embed
Embed Benchmark Result
Test name
Executions per second
array.slice()
10141853.0 Ops/sec
array.splice()
12222229.0 Ops/sec
array.shift()
5769088.0 Ops/sec
Spread syntax
11104022.0 Ops/sec
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's dive into the explanation. **Benchmark Definition** The provided JSON represents a JavaScript microbenchmarking test case on MeasureThat.net. The benchmark is designed to compare the speed of four different approaches for removing 2 items from the beginning of an array: 1. `array.slice(2)` 2. `array.splice(0, 2)` 3. `for (let i = 0; i < 2; i++) array.shift()` 4. Spread syntax (`var [one, tow, ...others] = array; array = others;`) Each test case defines a separate benchmarking scenario, with the script preparation code and HTML preparation code specified. **Comparison of Approaches** Here's an overview of each approach, their pros and cons: 1. **`array.slice(2)`**: This method creates a new array by slicing the original array from index 2 to the end. It's a simple and efficient way to remove elements. * Pros: Fast, easy to implement, and doesn't modify the original array. * Cons: Creates a new array, which can be memory-intensive for large datasets. 2. **`array.splice(0, 2)`**: This method modifies the original array by removing the first two elements. It's a more efficient way to remove elements compared to slicing. * Pros: Fast, modifies the original array, and doesn't create a new one. * Cons: Modifies the original array, which might be undesirable in some cases. 3. **`for (let i = 0; i < 2; i++) array.shift()`**: This method uses a loop to shift each element from the beginning of the array until two elements are removed. * Pros: Easy to understand and implement, doesn't modify the original array. * Cons: Slow compared to other methods (O(n) complexity), creates multiple temporary variables. 4. **Spread syntax (`var [one, tow, ...others] = array; array = others;`)**: This method uses the spread operator to create a new array by extracting elements from the original array. * Pros: Fast, easy to implement, and doesn't modify the original array. * Cons: Might be slower than other methods for very large datasets due to the overhead of creating a new array. **Library and Special Features** The test case does not explicitly use any libraries or special features like async/await, Promises, or Web Workers. However, it's worth noting that MeasureThat.net might be using some internal library or mechanism to execute the benchmarks. **Other Considerations** * The benchmark measures the number of executions per second (ExecutionsPerSecond) for each test case. * The test cases are executed on a desktop environment with Chrome 125 and Windows operating system. * The raw UA string is included in the benchmark result, which might indicate specific browser or device characteristics. **Alternatives** Some alternative approaches to removing elements from an array could include: * Using `Array.prototype.forEach()` with the `continue` statement to skip over elements * Utilizing `Map` data structure instead of arrays for efficient lookups and removals * Implementing custom iteration mechanisms, like using `IndexedCollection` or `ArrayView` However, these alternatives might not be as straightforward or well-supported as the methods compared in the benchmark.
Related benchmarks:
Slice vs Splice vs Shift
Slice vs Splice vs Shift (Large Array)
Slice vs Splice vs Shift for 1 item
Slice vs Splice vs Shift 231
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?