Benchmark: Test 444444 - MeasureThat.net

Tests:

шаблонные строки
for (let i = 0; i <= 10000; i++) { const tagName = 'Test'; const el = document.createElement('div'); el.classList.add('tag', 'js__tag'); el.className = 'tag js__tag'; el.title = tagName; el.innerHTML = `<span class="tag__name js__tag-name">${tagName}</span>`; }
createElement
for (let i = 0; i <= 10000; i++) { const tagName = 'Test'; const el = document.createElement('div'); const spanName = document.createElement('span'); spanName.className = 'tag__name js__tag-name'; spanName.textContent = tagName; el.appendChild(spanName); }

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
шаблонные строки
createElement

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: one year ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:126.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/126.0

Browser/OS: Firefox 126 on Windows

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
шаблонные строки	6.9 Ops/sec
createElement	11.5 Ops/sec

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

I'll break down the provided benchmark and explain what's being tested, compared options, pros and cons, and other considerations.

**Benchmark Overview**

MeasureThat.net provides a platform for JavaScript microbenchmarks. The website allows users to create and run benchmarks to compare different approaches to specific tasks.

In this case, we have two individual test cases:

1. "шаблонные строки" (template strings)
2. `createElement`

These test cases are defined in the provided JSON files, which contain the benchmark definition, script preparation code, HTML preparation code, and other metadata.

**Test Case 1: "шаблонные строки"**

This test case uses template literals to create a string with a specific format. The benchmark definition is:
```javascript
for (let i = 0; i <= 10000; i++) {
    const tagName = 'Test';
    const el = document.createElement('div');
    el.classList.add('tag', 'js__tag');
    el.className = 'tag js__tag';
    el.title = tagName;
    el.innerHTML = `<span class="tag__name js__tag-name">${tagName}</span>`;
}
```
In this test, the browser is expected to create a string with the template literal and then use it as the innerHTML of an HTML element.

**Test Case 2: `createElement`**

This test case uses the `document.createElement()` method to create a new HTML element. The benchmark definition is:
```javascript
for (let i = 0; i <= 10000; i++) {
    const tagName = 'Test';
    const el = document.createElement('div');
    const spanName = document.createElement('span');
    spanName.className = 'tag__name js__tag-name';
    spanName.textContent = tagName;
    el.appendChild(spanName);
}
```
In this test, the browser is expected to create a string with the `textContent` property of the `spanName` element and then use it as the innerHTML of an HTML element.

**Comparison**

The two tests are designed to compare the performance of creating a string using template literals versus the `createElement()` method.

**Pros and Cons:**

1. **Template Literals:**
	* Pros:
		+ More readable and maintainable code
		+ Less prone to errors due to string concatenation
	* Cons:
		+ May have performance overhead due to string creation
2. **createElement:**
	* Pros:
		+ Can be more efficient for creating multiple elements in a loop
		+ Allows for more control over element creation and manipulation
	* Cons:
		+ More complex code, which can lead to errors
		+ May have performance overhead due to DOM manipulation

**Library:**

None of the tests use any external libraries.

**Special JS Features/Syntax:**

The test cases do not use any special JavaScript features or syntax. However, it's worth noting that template literals are a relatively recent addition to JavaScript (introduced in ECMAScript 2015) and may have different performance characteristics on older browsers or versions of JavaScript.

**Alternatives:**

Other alternatives for creating strings include:

* String concatenation using the `+` operator
* Using a string builder library

However, these approaches are generally less efficient and more prone to errors than template literals or the `createElement()` method.

Related benchmarks:

Test 444444 (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: шаблонные строки vs createElement

Created: one year ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

шаблонные строки

createElement

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):