Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
switch vs if
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
switch vs if
Created:
7 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<div class="test"></div>
Script Preparation code:
var v = 8;
Tests:
switch
switch (true) { case v === 1: break; case v === 2: break; case v === 3: break; case v === 4: break; case v === 5: break; case v === 6: break; case v === 7: break; default: ; }
if
if (v === 1) { } else if (v === 2) { } else if (v === 3) { } else if (v === 4) { } else if (v === 5) { } else if (v === 6) { } else if (v === 7) { } else if (v === 8) { } else { }
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
switch
if
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
Run details:
(Test run date:
8 months ago
)
User agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:143.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/143.0
Browser/OS:
Firefox 143 on Windows
View result in a separate tab
Embed
Embed Benchmark Result
Test name
Executions per second
switch
42150480.0 Ops/sec
if
37148368.0 Ops/sec
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.1:latest
, generated one year ago):
Let's dive into the world of JavaScript microbenchmarks on MeasureThat.net. **Benchmark Definition:** The benchmark is called "switch vs if" and compares the performance of two different programming constructs in JavaScript: `switch` statements and `if-else` chains. The test case uses a variable `v` with a value of 8, which will be used to evaluate both constructs. **Individual Test Cases:** There are two test cases: 1. **Switch**: This test case uses a `switch` statement with multiple `case` clauses and a default clause. 2. **If**: This test case uses an `if-else` chain with multiple `else if` conditions, ending with a final `else` clause. **Latest Benchmark Result:** The latest benchmark results show the execution performance (ExecutionsPerSecond) of both test cases on a Chrome 65 browser running on Linux. The results are: * Switch: 1071013.125 executions per second * If: 983776.125 executions per second **What's Being Tested?** In this benchmark, we're testing the performance difference between two JavaScript constructs for conditional execution: 1. **Switch statement**: A `switch` statement allows you to execute different blocks of code based on the value of a variable. It's particularly useful when you have multiple conditions to check. 2. **If-else chain**: An `if-else` chain is used to execute different blocks of code based on the value of a variable, with each condition checked in sequence. **Library Used:** None, this benchmark uses pure JavaScript constructs. **JavaScript Features or Syntax Used:** * None specific syntax or features are used. The test cases rely only on basic JavaScript constructs (switch statement and if-else chain). **Pros/Cons of Different Approaches:** In general: * **Switch statement**: Pros: + More concise code when dealing with multiple conditions. + Easier to read and maintain for large numbers of conditions. * Cons: + May be slower than if-else chains due to the overhead of creating a jump table (in older JavaScript engines). * **If-else chain**: Pros: + Generally faster than switch statements due to the simplicity of the code. + Can be used in situations where the number of conditions is small or dynamic. **Other Considerations:** When choosing between `switch` and `if-else` chains, consider the following: * **Code readability**: If you have a large number of conditions, a switch statement might be more readable due to its concise syntax. * **Performance**: In general, if-else chains tend to perform better than switch statements. However, modern JavaScript engines (e.g., V8) often optimize `switch` statements, making them comparable in performance. **Other Alternatives:** In some cases, you might use a different construct or approach: * **Object literal with conditions**: You can create an object with properties that correspond to specific conditions and use the `in` operator to check for presence. * **Function composition**: In modern JavaScript, you can use function composition to chain multiple functions together, creating a more functional programming style. In this specific benchmark, neither of these alternatives was used.
Related benchmarks:
querySelectorAll foreach vs getElementsByClassName [].forEach.call()
querySelectorAll foreach vs getElementsByClassName [].forEach.call() 2
querySelectorAll vs getElementsByClassName Test
element.children vs element.querySelectorAll vs element.querySelectorAll(:scope)
array.from.map vs array.from with map
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?