Benchmark: Style vs SetAttribue

Tests:

Style
let plusButton = document.createElement('div') plusButton.style.height = '32px' plusButton.style.width = '32px' plusButton.style.cursor = 'pointer' plusButton.style.backgroundSize = 'contain' plusButton.style.border = 'none'
SetAttribute
let plusButton = document.createElement('div') plusButton.setAttribute('style', ` height:32px; width:32px; cursor:pointer; background-size: contain; border: none;`)

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
Style
SetAttribute

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 8 months ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/138.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 138 on Windows

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
Style	200451.0 Ops/sec
SetAttribute	269747.8 Ops/sec

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's dive into the world of MeasureThat.net and analyze the provided benchmark.

**What is tested?**

MeasureThat.net tests two approaches to set styles for an HTML element: using the `style` attribute or setting individual properties like `height`, `width`, `cursor`, `backgroundSize`, and `border`. The benchmark evaluates which approach is faster, in terms of execution speed.

**Options compared**

Two options are compared:

1. **Using the `style` attribute**: This method sets all styles as a single string, e.g., `" height:32px; width:32px; cursor:pointer; background-size: contain; border: none;"`.
2. **Setting individual properties**: This method sets each style property separately, like in the provided benchmark definitions.

**Pros and cons of each approach**

1. **Using the `style` attribute**:
	* Pros:
		+ Faster execution, as it only requires a single string to be parsed and applied.
		+ Easier to read and write, as all styles are combined into a single string.
	* Cons:
		+ Less readable for developers who prefer to separate styles by property.
2. **Setting individual properties**:
	* Pros:
		+ More readable and maintainable, as each style is set separately.
		+ Can be easier to understand and modify individual properties without affecting others.
	* Cons:
		+ Slower execution, as each style must be parsed and applied individually.

**Library**

In the provided benchmark definitions, the `document.createElement('div')` method is used to create an HTML element. This is a standard JavaScript API for creating new elements.

**Special JS feature or syntax**

There doesn't appear to be any special JavaScript features or syntax being tested in this benchmark. The focus is on comparing two approaches to set styles for an HTML element.

**Other alternatives**

If the `style` attribute is not available, alternative methods could include:

1. Using CSS styles: instead of setting styles using `style` attribute, you can use CSS styles by adding a style rule to the element's parent or itself.
2. Using DOM manipulation APIs: other DOM manipulation APIs like jQuery or vanilla JavaScript libraries might provide faster ways to set styles for elements.

For this specific benchmark, the MeasureThat.net API provides a simple and straightforward way to compare two approaches without requiring additional dependencies or setup.

Keep in mind that performance differences between these approaches can be influenced by various factors, such as browser version, engine, and hardware. This benchmark is likely intended to provide a general idea of the relative execution speeds for each approach across multiple browsers and devices.

Related benchmarks:

Style vs SetAttribue (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: Style vs SetAttribute

Created: one year ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

Style

SetAttribute

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):