Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
ramdajs contains
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
ramdajs contains vs vanilla
Created:
7 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<script src="//cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/ramda/0.25.0/ramda.min.js"></script>
Script Preparation code:
var arr = ['a', 'b', 'c'];
Tests:
ramdajs contains
R.contains('b', arr)
vanilla
arr.indexOf('b')
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
ramdajs contains
vanilla
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.1:latest
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the benchmark and explain what is being tested. **Benchmark Definition** The benchmark tests how fast two different approaches are to check if an element ('b') exists in an array ['a', 'b', 'c']. **Test Cases** There are two test cases: 1. **Vanilla**: This test case uses a built-in JavaScript method, `indexOf()`, to search for the element 'b' in the array. 2. **ramdajs contains**: This test case uses a function from the Ramda library (`R.contains()`) to check if the element 'b' is present in the array. **Benchmark Results** The results show how many executions per second (EPS) each approach can handle on a specific device (Chrome 66 on Mac OS X 10.12.6). **Comparison of Approaches** Here are the pros and cons of each approach: ### Vanilla (`indexOf()`) * **Pros**: Built-in method, widely supported by browsers. * **Cons**: Might be slower due to its general-purpose nature. ### ramdajs (`R.contains()`) * **Pros**: Might be faster since it's optimized for this specific use case. Also uses a more functional programming style. * **Cons**: Requires the Ramda library to be loaded, which adds overhead and might not be suitable for all projects. **Ramda Library** The Ramda library is a popular JavaScript library that provides functional programming utilities, including data manipulation and transformation functions. In this benchmark, `R.contains()` is used to check if an element exists in an array. **Other Alternatives** If you don't want to use the Ramda library, there are other alternatives to achieve similar results: 1. **filter()**: You can use the `filter()` method to create a new array with only the elements that match the condition. 2. **every() and includes()**: In modern browsers, you can use the `every()` method in combination with `includes()` to check if an element exists in an array. For example: ```javascript const arr = ['a', 'b', 'c']; if (arr.every(x => x === 'b')) { // do something } ``` These alternatives might have different performance characteristics and use cases, but they can help you achieve similar results to the original benchmark.
Related benchmarks:
ramdajs contains
ramdajs contains
Lodash vs Ramda fromPairs
Lodash vs Ramda vs Native fromPairs
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?