Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
ramdajs contains
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
ramdajs contains vs vanilla
Created:
8 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<script src="//cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/ramda/0.25.0/ramda.min.js"></script>
Script Preparation code:
var arr = ['a', 'b', 'c'];
Tests:
ramdajs contains
R.contains('b', arr)
vanilla
arr.includes('b')
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
ramdajs contains
vanilla
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
gemma2:9b
, generated one year ago):
This benchmark compares the performance of two ways to check if an element exists within an array: **Option 1: `R.contains('b', arr)`** * This uses the `contains` function from the Ramda library. Ramda is a functional programming library for JavaScript that promotes immutability and concise code. * **Pros:** Can be more readable and expressive for certain use cases, potentially leveraging optimizations within the Ramda implementation. * **Cons:** Introduces an external dependency (Ramda), which can add size to your project and may not be familiar to all developers. **Option 2: `arr.includes('b')`** * This uses the built-in `includes` method available directly in modern JavaScript. * **Pros:** No external dependencies, widely supported across browsers, generally considered performant for its simplicity. * **Cons:** Might not be as concise or expressive compared to Ramda's approach. **Other Considerations:** * **Profiling:** The benchmark results show that `arr.includes('b')` is significantly faster in this specific case (over 3 times). However, performance can vary depending on array size and the complexity of the data. * **Context Matters:** The best choice often depends on the overall code style and project requirements. If you heavily use functional programming patterns with Ramda, consistency might be a priority. Otherwise, `includes` is likely the more practical option for general-purpose array checking. Let me know if you'd like to explore other benchmark examples or have more questions about JavaScript performance!
Related benchmarks:
ramdajs contains
ramdajs contains
Lodash vs Ramda fromPairs
Lodash vs Ramda vs Native fromPairs
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?