Toggle navigation
MeasureThat
.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
jQuery vs querySelector for classes
(version: 0)
Comparing speed of getting element by id with jQuery vs Vanilla JS with getElementById and querySelector
Comparing performance of:
jQuery vs querySelector
Created:
2 years ago
by:
Guest
Go to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<script src="http://ajax.aspnetcdn.com/ajax/jQuery/jquery-3.1.0.min.js"></script> <div id="testElement" class="test class list classes"></div>
Tests:
jQuery
var el = $(".classes")[0];
querySelector
var el = document.querySelector(".classes");
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
jQuery
querySelector
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
Run details:
(Test run date:
one month ago
)
User agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; CPU iPhone OS 18_7 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/605.1.15 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/26.5 Mobile/15E148 Safari/604.1
Browser/OS:
Mobile Safari 26 on iOS 18.7
View result in a separate tab
Embed
Embed Benchmark Result
querySelector
14.9M/s
jQuery
5.1M/s
View exact numbers
Test name
Executions per second
✓
querySelector
14,913,664 Ops/sec
jQuery
5,080,280 Ops/sec
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
I'd be happy to explain the benchmark and its results. **Benchmark Description** The benchmark is designed to compare the speed of two approaches for selecting an element by its class in JavaScript: 1. **jQuery**: The jQuery library provides a convenient way to select elements using CSS selectors, including classes. 2. **Vanilla JS with getElementById and querySelector**: This approach uses the `getElementById` method (which doesn't work here since there's no id) and then queries the resulting element using the `querySelector` function. **Options Compared** The benchmark compares two options: 1. **jQuery**: Uses the jQuery library to select elements by class. 2. **Vanilla JS with getElementById and querySelector**: Uses the native JavaScript functions `getElementById` (not used here) and `querySelector`. **Pros and Cons of Each Approach** * **jQuery**: + Pros: - Easy to use and convenient for common use cases. - Reduces boilerplate code. + Cons: - Adds an extra dependency (the jQuery library). - May have performance overhead due to the abstraction layer. * **Vanilla JS with getElementById and querySelector**: + Pros: - No additional dependencies beyond native JavaScript functions. - Can be optimized for performance. + Cons: - Requires manual CSS selector parsing and execution, which can add complexity. - May require more boilerplate code. **Library: jQuery** jQuery is a popular JavaScript library that simplifies DOM manipulation and event handling. In this benchmark, it's used to select elements by class using the `$(selector)` syntax. The library provides an abstraction layer over the native browser functionality, making it easier to work with elements. **Special JS Feature or Syntax** This benchmark doesn't use any special JavaScript features or syntax beyond CSS selectors and native functions like `querySelector`. However, some versions of JavaScript (like ECMAScript 2015+) might offer newer APIs for selecting elements by class, such as `classList` on DOM elements. **Other Alternatives** If you need to select elements by class in a JavaScript context without using jQuery or vanilla JS with `querySelector`, consider the following alternatives: 1. **Sizzle**: A CSS selector engine that's similar to jQuery's selector parsing algorithm. 2. **Query.js**: Another lightweight CSS selector library for JavaScript. 3. **DOM Traversals**: You can also use native DOM traversal methods, such as `NodeList.prototype.item` or `Array.prototype.forEach`, to iterate over elements and find matches. Keep in mind that each of these alternatives has its own trade-offs and performance characteristics, so choose the one that best fits your needs.
Related benchmarks
jQuery vs getElementById vs querySelector
jQuery vs getElementById vs querySelector jquery 3.6.3
jQuery vs getElementById vs querySelector vs $(getElementById) jquery 3.6.3
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?