Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Object Property Access Notation: Destructuring vs. Dot. vs. Bracket - Large Object
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
Destructuring Notation vs Dot Notation vs Bracket Notation
Created:
2 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
var globalData = { data: { property: "value", }, string: 'Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.', number: 123456789, boolean: true, array: [1, 2, 3, 4, 5], object: { key: 'value', nested: { key: 'nested value' } }, date: new Date(), function: function() { console.log('Hello, world!'); }, nullValue: null, undefinedValue: undefined, stringArray: ['a', 'b', 'c', 'd', 'e'], numberArray: [10, 20, 30, 40, 50], booleanArray: [true, false, true, false, true], objectArray: [{ name: 'Alice', age: 30 }, { name: 'Bob', age: 25 }, { name: 'Charlie', age: 35 }], nestedArray: [[1, 2, 3], ['a', 'b', 'c'], [{ key: 'value' }, { key: 'value' }]], mixedArray: [1, 'a', true, { key: 'value' }, [10, 20, 30]], arrayOfArrays: [ [1, 2, 3], ['a', 'b', 'c'], [true, false, true], [{ key: 'value' }, { key: 'value' }], [[1, 2, 3], ['a', 'b', 'c']] ], arrayOfObjects: [ { name: 'Alice', age: 30 }, { name: 'Bob', age: 25 }, { name: 'Charlie', age: 35 }, { name: 'David', age: 40 }, { name: 'Eve', age: 45 } ], deepNestedArray: [ [1, [2, [3, [4, [5]]]]], ['a', ['b', ['c', ['d', ['e']]]]], [{ key: 'value', nested: { key: 'nested value' } }] ] };
Tests:
Destructuring Notation
var { data } = globalData;
Dot Notation
var dot = globalData.data;
Bracket Notation
var bracket = globalData['data']
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (3)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Destructuring Notation
Dot Notation
Bracket Notation
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
Run details:
(Test run date:
one year ago
)
User agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/124.0.0.0 Safari/537.36
Browser/OS:
Chrome 124 on Linux
View result in a separate tab
Embed
Embed Benchmark Result
Test name
Executions per second
Destructuring Notation
15636291.0 Ops/sec
Dot Notation
16066946.0 Ops/sec
Bracket Notation
15472933.0 Ops/sec
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's dive into the world of JavaScript microbenchmarks and explore what's being tested on this provided JSON. **Benchmark Definition** The benchmark is designed to compare three different ways of accessing an object's property: Destructuring Notation, Dot Notation, and Bracket Notation. The test case uses a large object `globalData` with various types of properties (strings, numbers, booleans, arrays, objects, dates, functions, nulls, and undefineds). **Options Compared** The three options being compared are: 1. **Destructuring Notation**: This syntax allows you to assign multiple properties from an object to separate variables in a single statement. For example: `var { data } = globalData;`. 2. **Dot Notation**: This syntax involves accessing a property using a dot (`.`) separator, like this: `globalData.data;`. 3. **Bracket Notation**: This syntax uses bracket notation (e.g., `globalData['data']`) to access properties. **Pros and Cons** Here's a brief overview of the pros and cons of each approach: * **Destructuring Notation**: + Pros: concise, expressive, and often faster in modern browsers. + Cons: may be less readable for those unfamiliar with this syntax. * **Dot Notation**: + Pros: widely supported, easy to read, and suitable for most cases. + Cons: can become cumbersome when dealing with deeply nested objects or multiple property accesses. * **Bracket Notation**: + Pros: flexible and suitable for accessing properties that may not be directly accessible using dot notation (e.g., properties with non-standard names). + Cons: may be slower, less readable, and more prone to typos. **Library Usage** The test case uses no external libraries. The `globalData` object is defined within the benchmark script itself. **Special JS Features or Syntax** No special JavaScript features or syntax are mentioned in the provided JSON. However, it's worth noting that some older browsers may not support modern ES6+ syntaxes like destructuring notation. **Alternatives** If you're interested in exploring alternative approaches or testing different scenarios, here are a few suggestions: * Consider adding additional properties to the `globalData` object to test other access patterns (e.g., accessing nested objects, arrays within objects). * Experiment with using different data structures (e.g., JSON-like objects, arrays of objects) to create more complex benchmarking scenarios. * Test how well each approach performs on various browsers or devices to identify potential performance differences. Keep in mind that this is just a starting point for exploring the world of JavaScript microbenchmarks. You can always refine and modify the test cases to better suit your specific use case or goals!
Related benchmarks:
Object Property Access Notation: Destructuring vs. Dot. vs. Bracket
dot (.) vs destructure
Object Property Access Notation: Destructuring vs. Dot. vs. Bracket (deep destructing)
Object Property Access Notation: Destructuring vs. Dot. vs. Bracket with multiple accessing
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?