Benchmark: Aaaaaaaaaaaaaa - MeasureThat.net

Script Preparation code:

function generateUUID() {
    return 'xxxxxxxx-xxxx-4xxx-yxxx-xxxxxxxxxxxx'.replace(/[xy]/g, function(c) {
        var r = (Math.random() * 16) | 0,
            v = c == 'x' ? r : (r & 0x3) | 0x8;
        return v.toString(16);
    });
}

var objectsArray = [];
var itemsArray = [];

const item = {
    "id": "72fdff2b-1fef-4d5a-944b-bf04e27ccd73",
    "title": "Teste",
    "type": "text",
    "tags": []
}
const object = {
    "72fdff2b-1fef-4d5a-944b-bf04e27ccd73": {
        "title": "Teste",
        "type": "text",
        "tags": []
    }
}

function generateItem() {
    return {
        id: generateUUID(),
        title: 'Teste',
        type: 'text',
        tags: []
    };
}


function generateObject() {
    let uuid = generateUUID();
    return {
        [uuid]: {
            title: 'Teste',
            type: 'text',
            tags: []
        }
    };
}

// Gerar um array de objetos no formato JSON
for (let i = 0; i < 100000; i++) {
    objectsArray.push(generateObject());
}
objectsArray.push(object);
for (let i = 0; i < 100000; i++) {
    itemsArray.push(generateItem());
}
itemsArray.push(item);

Tests:

USando array
objectsArray["72fdff2b-1fef-4d5a-944b-bf04e27ccd73"]
Usando função find
itemsArray.find((menssage) => menssage.id === "72fdff2b-1fef-4d5a-944b-bf04e27ccd73")

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
USando array
Usando função find

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 2 years ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/124.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 124 on Windows

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
USando array	7886322.5 Ops/sec
Usando função find	341.4 Ops/sec

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

**What is being tested?**

MeasureThat.net is testing the performance of two different methods for accessing and manipulating data in JavaScript: arrays and functions (specifically, the `find()` method).

The benchmark defines two test cases:

1. "USando array" (Using Array): This test case accesses an element in the `objectsArray` using its index (`objectsArray["72fdff2b-1fef-4d5a-944b-bf04e27ccd73"]`).
2. "Usando função find" (Using Function Find): This test case uses the `find()` method to search for an element in the `itemsArray` that matches a specific condition (`itemsArray.find((menssage) => menssage.id === "72fdff2b-1fef-4d5a-944b-bf04e27ccd73")`).

**Options compared**

The benchmark is comparing two options:

A. **Arrays**: This option uses direct array access to retrieve an element.
B. **Function Find**: This option uses the `find()` method with a callback function to search for an element.

**Pros and Cons of each approach**

**Arrays**

Pros:

* Direct access, no overhead from function calls
* Typically faster than function-based approaches

Cons:

* Limited flexibility and error handling capabilities
* Can be brittle if data structure changes

**Function Find**

Pros:

* More flexible and robust than direct array access
* Easier to handle errors and edge cases

Cons:

* May incur additional overhead due to function calls
* Can be slower than direct array access for large datasets

**Other considerations**

* The `find()` method is a part of the ECMAScript standard, making it a good choice for cross-browser compatibility.
* The benchmark uses Chrome 124 as the browser, which may not represent other browsers' performance characteristics.

**Library usage**

The benchmark uses JavaScript built-in functions and data structures (arrays, objects), without relying on any external libraries. However, if we were to analyze the `find()` method's implementation, it relies on the ECMAScript standard and some internal function call optimizations.

**Special JS features or syntax**

There are no special JS features or syntax used in this benchmark that would be unfamiliar to software engineers with a basic understanding of JavaScript. The use of `find()` is a common pattern in JavaScript, and the rest of the code follows standard practices.

Related benchmarks:

Aaaaaaaaaaaaaa (version: 0)

aads

Comparing performance of: USando array vs Usando função find

Created: 2 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

USando array

Usando função find

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):