Benchmark: class vs function mk I

Tests:

class
class Test { constructor(x) { this.x = x; } add() { return (Math.pow(this.x, 10) + Math.exp(this.x) + Math.sin(this.x) - Math.cos(this.x)); } } for (var i = 0; i < 100; i++) { new Test(34235345345342342323423422334423).add(); }
function
function add(x) { return (Math.pow(x, 10) + Math.exp(x) + Math.sin(x) - Math.cos(x)); } for (var i = 0; i < 100; i++) { add(34235345345342342323423422334423); }

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
class
function

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 2 years ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:125.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/125.0

Browser/OS: Firefox 125 on Mac OS X 10.15

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
class	210906.5 Ops/sec
function	20574324.0 Ops/sec

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's break down the provided benchmarking scenario.

**Benchmark Definition and Preparation Code**

The `Script Preparation Code` is empty, which means that no setup code needs to be executed before running the benchmark tests. This is often the case when comparing built-in functions or methods.

**Individual Test Cases**

There are two test cases:

1. **Class Test**
	* The `Benchmark Definition` is a JavaScript class definition with a constructor and an `add()` method.
	* The `Test Name` is "class", indicating that this test case uses the class-based approach.
2. **Function Test**
	* The `Benchmark Definition` is a standalone JavaScript function named `add()`.
	* The `Test Name` is "function", indicating that this test case uses the function-based approach.

**Library Usage**

None of the test cases use any external libraries or frameworks.

**Special JS Feature/Syntax**

There are no special JavaScript features or syntax used in these test cases. Both classes and functions follow standard JavaScript conventions.

**Comparison**

The two test cases compare the performance of class-based and function-based implementations of a simple mathematical operation (`add()`) with multiple iterations (100 times).

**Pros and Cons of Different Approaches**

1. **Class-Based Approach**
	* Pros:
		+ Can encapsulate data and behavior, promoting object-oriented programming principles.
		+ May provide better code organization and reusability.
	* Cons:
		+ Can result in slower execution due to the overhead of object creation and method invocation.
2. **Function-Based Approach**
	* Pros:
		+ Is generally faster and more lightweight than class-based implementations.
		+ Does not require the creation of objects, reducing memory allocation and garbage collection overhead.
	* Cons:
		+ May lack encapsulation and code organization benefits.

**Other Considerations**

To accurately compare these test cases, it's essential to consider factors like:

1. **Method invocation overhead**: In class-based implementations, method invocation involves creating an object instance, which can lead to additional memory allocation and garbage collection overhead.
2. **Object creation overhead**: Class-based implementations require the creation of objects for each iteration, whereas function-based implementations do not create any objects.

**Alternative Approaches**

Other alternatives could be:

1. **Procedural Programming**: Implementing the `add()` operation using a traditional procedural programming style (e.g., using loops and arrays).
2. **Generator Functions**: Using generator functions to implement the `add()` operation, which can provide better performance due to the lack of object creation overhead.
3. **Arrow Functions**: Using arrow functions as an alternative to traditional function definitions.

These alternatives could be used to compare their performance with class-based and function-based implementations in a separate benchmarking scenario.

Related benchmarks:

class vs function mk I (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: class vs function

Created: 2 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

class

function

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):