Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
style➜display/backgroundColor VS setAttribute➜display/backgroundColor
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
style➜display vs setAttribute➜display
Created:
7 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<div id="foo"></div>
Tests:
style➜display
document.getElementById("foo").style.display = "none"; document.getElementById("foo").style.backgroundColor = "red";
setAttribute➜display
document.getElementById("foo").setAttribute('style', 'background-color:red;display:none;');
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
style➜display
setAttribute➜display
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the benchmark and its components. **Benchmark Definition** The provided JSON represents a benchmark definition, which is a set of rules that defines how to run a test case. In this case, there are two benchmark definitions: 1. `style➜display/backgroundColor`: This defines a test case where the `display` property of an HTML element is set to `none`, and then its `backgroundColor` property is set to `red`. 2. `setAttribute➜display`: This defines another test case where the `style` attribute of an HTML element is set to a CSS string that includes both `background-color` and `display` properties, and then these properties are set individually. **Options Compared** The two benchmark definitions compare two different approaches to setting styles on an HTML element: 1. Using the `style` property (property-based approach): This method directly sets the style properties on the element. 2. Using the `setAttribute` method with a CSS string (attribute-based approach): This method sets the `style` attribute of the element to a CSS string that includes both `background-color` and `display` properties, and then these properties are set individually. **Pros and Cons** Here's a summary of the pros and cons of each approach: **Property-Based Approach (using `style` property)** Pros: * More direct and efficient way to set styles * May be faster since it avoids the overhead of setting an attribute Cons: * Can lead to inconsistent results if the CSS string is malformed or not properly parsed by older browsers * Limited control over the parsing and execution of the CSS code **Attribute-Based Approach (using `setAttribute` method)** Pros: * Allows for more control over the parsing and execution of the CSS code * Can provide consistent results across different browsers, even if they have different stylesheets or parser engines Cons: * May be slower since it involves setting an attribute and then parsing the CSS string * Requires additional overhead to parse and execute the CSS code **Other Considerations** * The benchmark also compares the performance of using `style` property vs. `setAttribute` method for other style properties, such as `opacity`, `width`, and `height`. * The benchmark uses a specific HTML element (`<div>`) with an ID of `"foo"`, which may affect the results. * The benchmark runs on multiple browsers (Chrome 68) and platforms (Windows 8.1), which can provide more representative results. **Library/Functionality Used** None, as this is a basic JavaScript benchmark that only uses built-in functions like `document.getElementById()` and `style` property. **Special JS Features/Syntax** There are no special JS features or syntax used in this benchmark.
Related benchmarks:
jQuery ids vs classes
Selector performance in JQuery 345
TESt selector
CSS selector best performance
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?