Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Moment Dayjs comparison
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
Moment vs Dayjs
Created:
2 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<script src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/dayjs@1/dayjs.min.js"></script> <script src='https://momentjs.com/downloads/moment.min.js'></script>
Script Preparation code:
window.ds = "2020-02-19T00:51:53.623839+00:00";
Tests:
Moment
moment(ds)
Dayjs
dayjs(ds)
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Moment
Dayjs
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
Run details:
(Test run date:
2 years ago
)
User agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/123.0.0.0 Safari/537.36
Browser/OS:
Chrome 123 on Mac OS X 10.15.7
View result in a separate tab
Embed
Embed Benchmark Result
Test name
Executions per second
Moment
242126.9 Ops/sec
Dayjs
593459.3 Ops/sec
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided JSON and explain what's being tested. **Overview** MeasureThat.net is a website that allows users to create and run JavaScript microbenchmarks. The provided JSON represents a benchmark test comparing two libraries: Moment.js and Dayjs. The goal is to measure which library performs better for date manipulation. **Options Compared** The options being compared are: 1. **Moment.js**: A popular JavaScript library for working with dates and times. 2. **Dayjs**: A lightweight alternative to Moment.js, designed to be faster and more efficient. **Pros and Cons of Each Approach** 1. **Moment.js**: * Pros: + Mature and widely adopted, with a large community and extensive documentation. + Supports a wide range of date formats and features (e.g., timezone support). * Cons: + Larger in size and slower due to its feature-rich nature. 2. **Dayjs**: * Pros: + Smaller in size, making it faster and more efficient for simple date calculations. + Designed for speed and has a smaller codebase. * Cons: + Less mature than Moment.js, with fewer features and less extensive documentation. **Library Used** In this benchmark, both libraries are used to parse the same timestamp string (`ds`) passed as an argument. Dayjs is chosen as the input library, while Moment.js is used for comparison. **Special JS Feature or Syntax** There doesn't appear to be any special JavaScript feature or syntax being tested in this benchmark. The tests only involve simple date manipulation (i.e., parsing a timestamp string). **Alternatives** If you're looking for alternative libraries to these two, some options include: 1. **Lux**: A high-performance library designed for precise and efficient date calculations. 2. **Date-fns**: A modern JavaScript library that provides an extensive set of date-related functions with a simple API. Keep in mind that each library has its strengths and weaknesses, and the choice ultimately depends on your specific requirements and use case. Let me know if you have any further questions or need more information!
Related benchmarks:
Moment Dayjs Date-fns comparison
Moment Dayjs Date-fns format benchmark
Moment Dayjs Date-fns date format benchmark
Moment Dayjs Date-fns date format benchmark with abs comparitor
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?