Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Fastest way to check if object is empty 2
(version: 0)
You don't need to make add for loops in your test scenarios, the benchmark does it itself.
Comparing performance of:
object.keys() vs JSON.stringify() vs Object.values()
Created:
2 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
var xxx = { "firstName":"John", "LastName":"Plum", "occupation": "web Developer", "Hobbies": ["Reading", "Coding", "Basket Ball", "Football", "Movies", "Music"], "married" : true, "Age" : 29 }
Tests:
object.keys()
Object.keys(xxx) === 0
JSON.stringify()
JSON.stringify(xxx) === "{}"
Object.values()
Object.values(xxx) === 0
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (3)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
object.keys()
JSON.stringify()
Object.values()
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
Run details:
(Test run date:
2 years ago
)
User agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/123.0.0.0 Safari/537.36
Browser/OS:
Chrome 123 on Windows
View result in a separate tab
Embed
Embed Benchmark Result
Test name
Executions per second
object.keys()
6631819.0 Ops/sec
JSON.stringify()
1809832.5 Ops/sec
Object.values()
6015957.5 Ops/sec
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided benchmark and explain what's being tested, compared, and their pros and cons. **Benchmark Overview** The benchmark measures the performance of three different ways to check if an object is empty: 1. `Object.keys(xxx) === 0` 2. `JSON.stringify(xxx) === ""` (note: this will throw a TypeError in modern browsers, but it's still being tested) 3. `Object.values(xxx) === 0` **What are we testing?** We're testing the performance of these three methods on an object with different amounts of data. The object `xxx` is defined as: ```javascript var xxx = { ... } ``` It has a few properties: * `firstName`: "John" * `LastName`: "Plum" * `occupation`: "web Developer" * `Hobbies`: an array of 6 strings * `married`: true * `Age`: 29 The object is created using the provided script preparation code. **Comparison** The benchmark compares the performance of these three methods on the same object with different amounts of data: * A small object with no properties (`Object.keys(xxx) === 0`) * An object with a few properties (e.g., `firstName`, `LastName`, `married`) (`JSON.stringify(xxx) === ""` is not tested for this case, as it will throw a TypeError) * An object with an array of many strings (`Hobbies`) (`Object.values(xxx) === 0`) **Pros and Cons** 1. **Object.keys(xxx) === 0** * Pros: simple, straightforward way to check if an object is empty * Cons: may not be efficient for large objects, as it has to iterate over all properties 2. **JSON.stringify(xxx) === ""` (note: this will throw a TypeError in modern browsers) * Pros: can be used to check if an object is empty, but only works for simple objects * Cons: may not work correctly for more complex objects or arrays, and will throw an error in modern browsers 3. **Object.values(xxx) === 0** * Pros: efficient way to check if an array is empty, can be used to check if an object has no properties * Cons: requires the use of `Object.values()`, which may not be supported in older browsers **Other Considerations** In modern JavaScript, it's recommended to use the `Object.keys()` method with the `length` property to check if an object is empty: ```javascript if (Object.keys(xxx).length === 0) { // object is empty } ``` This approach is more efficient and reliable than using the `=== 0` comparison, which may not work correctly for all objects. **Library and Special JS Features** The benchmark uses the following library: * None explicitly mentioned, but it's implied that the `JSON.stringify()` method is being tested against a specific implementation of JSON serialization. There are no special JavaScript features or syntaxes being used in this benchmark.
Related benchmarks:
Fastest way to check if object is empty
Fastest way to check if object is empty (for in vs.
Fastest way to check if object is empty - EP3
Fastest way to check if object is empty using length
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?