Benchmark: testing values vs keys to check empty {}

HTML Preparation code:

<div>Testing</div>
<div id="test"></div>

Script Preparation code:

var xxx = {}

Tests:

Object.values
Object.values(xxx).length === 0
Object.keys
Object.values(xxx).length === 0

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
Object.values
Object.keys

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 2 years ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/123.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 123 on Linux

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
Object.values	7839848.0 Ops/sec
Object.keys	7856841.0 Ops/sec

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's dive into the world of JavaScript microbenchmarks on MeasureThat.net.

**What is being tested?**

The provided JSON represents two test cases that compare the performance of `Object.keys()` and `Object.values()` methods in retrieving values from an empty object (`xxx`).

**Options being compared:**

1. **Object.keys()**: Returns an array of strings representing the keys of the given object.
2. **Object.values()**: Returns an array of values for each key in the given object.

**Pros and Cons of each approach:**

* **Object.keys():**
	+ Pros:
		- Can be faster since it only retrieves the keys, which is typically less data than retrieving the actual values.
		- May require less memory allocation since it doesn't need to allocate space for the retrieved values.
	+ Cons:
		- Requires a separate step to iterate over the keys and retrieve the corresponding values using `Object.getOWNProperty()`.
		- Can be slower in cases where the object has many keys, as looking up each key requires a dictionary lookup.
* **Object.values():**
	+ Pros:
		- Provides a more straightforward way to retrieve all values from an object, eliminating the need for extra iteration or lookups.
	+ Cons:
		- Typically requires more memory allocation since it needs to store the retrieved values in an array.
		- May be slower due to the increased number of dictionary lookups.

**Library and its purpose:**

In this case, there is no explicit library mentioned. However, `Object.keys()` and `Object.values()` are built-in methods of the JavaScript Object prototype.

**Special JS feature or syntax:**

There doesn't seem to be any special features or syntax used in these benchmark definitions. They rely solely on standard JavaScript functionality.

**Other alternatives:**

If you're looking for alternative approaches, you could consider using:

* **Object.entries()**: Returns an array of key-value pairs for each property in the given object.
* **for...in loops**: Iterate over the keys and retrieve the corresponding values manually.
* **Array.prototype.map()**: Map over the keys to create a new array with the retrieved values.

Keep in mind that these alternatives might have different performance characteristics and use cases, so it's essential to consider your specific requirements before choosing an approach.

**Benchmark preparation code:**

The provided script preparation code creates an empty object `xxx` using `var xxx = {}`. This sets up a simple scenario for testing the behavior of `Object.keys()` and `Object.values()`. The HTML preparation code includes two `<div>` elements, which are used to render the test results.

Related benchmarks:

testing values vs keys to check empty {} (version: 0)

testing values vs keys to check empty {}

Comparing performance of: Object.values vs Object.keys

Created: 2 years ago by: Registered User

Jump to the latest result

Object.values

Object.keys

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):