Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Date.toLocaleDateString with options
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
with locale vs without locale
Created:
8 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
with locale
const x = new Date().toLocaleDateString('en-US');
without locale
const x = new Date().toLocaleDateString();
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
with locale
without locale
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
gemma2:9b
, generated one year ago):
This benchmark tests the performance of using `Date.toLocaleDateString()` in JavaScript with and without specifying a locale. **Options Compared:** 1. **`without locale`**: This option simply calls `toLocaleDateString()` without providing any arguments. The browser's default locale is used to format the date string. 2. **`with locale`**: This option calls `toLocaleDateString()` with the argument `'en-US'`, explicitly setting the locale to US English. **Pros and Cons:** * **Without Locale:** * **Pro:** Simpler code, as no extra argument is needed. * **Con:** Potentially less predictable output if the user's browser locale differs from what you expect, leading to inconsistency across different users. * **With Locale:** * **Pro:** More control over date formatting, ensuring consistency regardless of the user's browser settings. * **Con:** Requires specifying the desired locale, which adds a bit more code complexity. **Other Considerations:** * **Performance Impact:** This benchmark aims to quantify the difference in performance between these two approaches. The results may vary depending on factors like the user's browser and system configuration. * **Real-World Usage:** Choosing between these options often depends on your application's needs. If consistency across different users is crucial, using a specific locale (`with locale`) is generally recommended. However, if simplicity is a priority and you can tolerate potential variations based on the user's locale, using the default locale (`without locale`) might be sufficient. **Alternatives:** * **`Intl.DateTimeFormat()`**: A more versatile API for date formatting that offers fine-grained control over various aspects of date representation. Let me know if you have any other questions about this benchmark or anything else related to JavaScript performance!
Related benchmarks:
Date.toLocaleDateString with options
Date.toLocaleDateString
locale
DateTimeFormat vs toLocaleDateString 3
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?