Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
object-hash
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
Sum vs Object-hash
Created:
2 years ago
by:
Registered User
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<script src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/hash-sum@2.0.0/hash-sum.min.js"></script> <script src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/object-hash@3.0.0/dist/object_hash.min.js"></script>
Script Preparation code:
var context1 = { title: 'fish', position: 1 } var context2 = { title: 'fish', position: 1 }
Tests:
Sum
sum(context1) === sum(context2)
Object-hash
objectHash(context1) === objectHash(context2)
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Sum
Object-hash
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
Run details:
(Test run date:
one year ago
)
User agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/128.0.0.0 Safari/537.36
Browser/OS:
Chrome 128 on Mac OS X 10.15.7
View result in a separate tab
Embed
Embed Benchmark Result
Test name
Executions per second
Sum
433725.5 Ops/sec
Object-hash
24344.1 Ops/sec
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
I'll break down the provided JSON data and explain what's being tested, compared, and the pros/cons of different approaches. **Benchmark Definition** The benchmark is designed to test the performance of two JavaScript functions: `sum` (from the `hash-sum` library) and `objectHash` (from the `object-hash` library). The benchmark is comparing the execution times of these two functions on two identical input objects, `context1` and `context2`. **Options Compared** The options being compared are: 1. **`sum(context1)`**: Uses the `hash-sum` library's `sum` function to calculate the hash sum of the `context1` object. 2. **`objectHash(context1)`**: Uses the `object-hash` library's `objectHash` function to calculate the hash of the `context1` object. **Pros and Cons** The choice between these two approaches depends on the specific use case and requirements: * **`sum(context1)`**: + Pros: - Typically provides a more comprehensive hash sum, which may be desirable for data integrity or security applications. - May be faster than `objectHash` for small to medium-sized input objects. + Cons: - Can produce larger hash values, which may be less suitable for certain use cases (e.g., limited storage capacity). * **`objectHash(context1)`**: + Pros: - Typically produces smaller, more compact hash values, making it suitable for applications with limited storage capacity. - May be faster than `sum(context1)` for very large input objects or when memory is a concern. + Cons: - May not provide the same level of data integrity as `sum(context1)`, depending on the specific use case. **Library Descriptions** 1. **`hash-sum` library**: Provides a simple and efficient way to calculate hash sums for JavaScript objects. It's designed to be fast and lightweight. 2. **`object-hash` library**: Offers a more comprehensive hash calculation approach, providing smaller, more compact hash values. It's suitable for applications where memory is a concern. **Special JS Feature or Syntax** There doesn't seem to be any special JavaScript features or syntax being used in this benchmark. The code appears to be standard JavaScript, using built-in functions and libraries (e.g., `JSON.parse` is not explicitly mentioned). **Other Alternatives** If you're looking for alternative libraries or approaches for calculating hash sums or object hashes, some options include: * **`crypto` module**: Built into Node.js, provides a range of cryptographic functions, including hash functions. * **`hashjs` library**: Offers a more comprehensive set of hash functions and algorithms, including SHA-256 and others. * **Custom implementation**: Depending on your specific requirements, you might consider implementing your own hash function or algorithm from scratch. Keep in mind that these alternatives may have different performance characteristics, trade-offs, and suitability for specific use cases compared to the `hash-sum` and `object-hash` libraries used in this benchmark.
Related benchmarks:
object-hash vs hash-sum
hash-sum vs object-hash vs object.entries
hash-sum vs object-hash 2
hash-sum vs object-hash opttimized 2
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?