Benchmark: mybenchmark123313131123123211312

Tests:

1
const forum = "technopat"; const FILTERS = [ "User", "Avatar", "Signature", ]; // Additional parameter const additionalParameter = "AnotherParameter"; function f(params) { return true; } const settings = f(FILTERS.map(value => `${forum}${value}`).concat(additionalParameter));
2
const forum = "technopat"; const FILTERS = [ "User", "Avatar", "Signature", ]; // Additional parameter const additionalParameter = "AnotherParameter"; function f(params) { return true; } const settings = f([...FILTERS.map(value => `${forum}${value}`), additionalParameter]);

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
1
2

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 2 years ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/122.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 122 on Windows

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
1	3435908.5 Ops/sec
2	10122923.0 Ops/sec

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's dive into explaining the JavaScript microbenchmark provided by MeasureThat.net.

**Benchmark Definition**

The benchmark definition is a JSON object that represents the code to be executed for the test case. In this case, there are two benchmark definitions:

1. `const forum = "technopat"; const FILTERS = [ "User", "Avatar", "Signature", ]; // Additional parameter const additionalParameter = "AnotherParameter"; function f(params) { return true; } const settings = f(FILTERS.map(value => `${forum}${value}`).concat(additionalParameter));`
2. `const forum = "technopat"; const FILTERS = [ "User", "Avatar", "Signature", ]; // Additional parameter const additionalParameter = "AnotherParameter"; function f(params) { return true; } const settings = f([...FILTERS.map(value => `${forum}${value}`), additionalParameter]);`

Both benchmark definitions use the same variables and functions, but differ in how the `FILTERS` array is processed before being passed to the `f()` function.

**Options Compared**

The two options compared are:

1. **Array.prototype.map()**: This method creates a new array with the results of applying a provided function on each element of the original array.
2. **Spread Operator (Array.prototype...)**: This operator spreads elements of an array into new arrays, allowing for the creation of a new array by concatenating multiple existing arrays.

**Pros and Cons**

**Array.prototype.map():**

Pros:

* More concise and expressive way to process arrays
* Can be faster due to optimizations in modern browsers

Cons:

* May not work as expected if the input data is not suitable (e.g., null or undefined values)
* Can lead to performance issues if the array is very large, as it creates a new array with the results

**Spread Operator (Array.prototype...):**

Pros:

* More explicit and easier to understand for developers familiar with JavaScript
* Works consistently across browsers and environments
* Allows for control over the processing of elements in the input array

Cons:

* May be slower due to additional overhead
* Can lead to more verbose code

**Other Considerations**

In this benchmark, using `Array.prototype.map()` may lead to better performance for larger input arrays, as it allows modern browsers to optimize the operation. However, if the input data is small or not suitable for mapping, the spread operator might be a better choice.

The use of the spread operator in option 2 also makes it easier to understand the code and control the processing of elements in the `FILTERS` array.

**Library Used**

There is no explicit library mentioned in the benchmark definitions. However, if we assume that the `f()` function is intended to be a simple function that takes an array as input and returns a result, then this function does not use any specific libraries beyond the standard JavaScript features.

**Special JS Feature or Syntax**

The only special feature used in this benchmark is the spread operator (`...`), which was introduced in ECMAScript 2015 (ES6). This operator allows for spreading elements of an array into a new array, making it easier to work with arrays and perform operations on them.

Related benchmarks:

mybenchmark123313131123123211312 (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: 1 vs 2

Created: 2 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

1

2

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):