Reduce vs Filter and Map (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: Filter and Map vs Reduce

Created: 2 years ago by: Registered User
Go to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
Tests:

Historical Performance Data aggregated from 6 community runs

Desktop Results:
Chrome 6 runs
Reduce
24K/s
Filter and Map
14K/s

Fastest: Reduce (1.7x faster)

View exact numbers
  • ✓ Reduce: 23,775 ops/sec
  • • Filter and Map: 13,744 ops/sec

Results show median performance across all community submissions. Run this benchmark yourself to verify on your device.

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results
  • Test case name Result
    Filter and Map
    Reduce

    Fastest: N/A

    Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:
Run details: (Test run date: 11 months ago)
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/139.0.0.0 Safari/537.36
Chrome 139 on Mac OS X 10.15.7
View result in a separate tab
Reduce
19K/s
Filter and Map
12K/s
View exact numbers
Test name Executions per second
✓ Reduce 19,065 Ops/sec
Filter and Map 11,652 Ops/sec

Related benchmarks