Benchmark: uwu345 - MeasureThat.net

Script Preparation code:

var a = [];
var b = new Set()

for(let i=0; i<1000000; i++){
	let obj = {
        "guildId" : "1053625705615305229",
        "userId" : "1011780524736263168",
        "ticketId" : (10)+Math.floor(Math.random() * 10),
        "messageId" : "1208720581302407058",
        "panelName" : "Pomoc",
        "closed" : false,
        "deleted" : false,
        "permissionsChanged" : false,
        "preventDuplicates" : false,
        "lastCategoryId" : "65c3979a6511c91a5f2f4183",
        "createdAt" : "2024-02-18T10:24:08.203+0000",
        "updatedAt" : "2024-02-18T10:24:09.482+0000",
        "__v" : (0),
        "channelId" : "1208720602043654194",
        "passTicketMessageId" : "1208721604514091028",
        "pingMessageId" : "1208720605694690523"
    }
    
    a.push(obj);
  
  	b.add(obj);
}

a.push({
        "guildId" : "1053625705615305229",
        "userId" : "1011780524736263168",
        "ticketId" : (10)+Math.floor(Math.random() * 10),
        "messageId" : "1208720581302407058",
        "panelName" : "Pomoc",
        "closed" : false,
        "deleted" : false,
        "permissionsChanged" : false,
        "preventDuplicates" : false,
        "lastCategoryId" : "65c3979a6511c91a5f2f4183",
        "createdAt" : "2024-02-18T10:24:08.203+0000",
        "updatedAt" : "2024-02-18T10:24:09.482+0000",
        "__v" : (0),
        "channelId" : "1208720602043654192",
        "passTicketMessageId" : "1208721604514091028",
        "pingMessageId" : "1208720605694690523"
    });
  
b.add({
        "guildId" : "1053625705615305229",
        "userId" : "1011780524736263168",
        "ticketId" : (10)+Math.floor(Math.random() * 10),
        "messageId" : "1208720581302407058",
        "panelName" : "Pomoc",
        "closed" : false,
        "deleted" : false,
        "permissionsChanged" : false,
        "preventDuplicates" : false,
        "lastCategoryId" : "65c3979a6511c91a5f2f4183",
        "createdAt" : "2024-02-18T10:24:08.203+0000",
        "updatedAt" : "2024-02-18T10:24:09.482+0000",
        "__v" : (0),
        "channelId" : "1208720602043654192",
        "passTicketMessageId" : "1208721604514091028",
        "pingMessageId" : "1208720605694690523"
    });

Tests:

essa1
let passed = []; for (const x of a) { if(x.channelId == "1208720602043654192") { passed.push(x); } }
uwu2
let passed2 = []; for (const x of b) { if(x.channelId == "1208720602043654192") { passed2.push(x); } }

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
essa1
uwu2

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 2 years ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/122.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 122 on Windows

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
essa1	106.0 Ops/sec
uwu2	120.4 Ops/sec

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

I'll break down the provided benchmark definition and test cases to explain what's being tested, compared, and their pros and cons.

**Benchmark Definition:**

The benchmark is testing the performance of JavaScript arrays (`a` and `b`) when used as iteration sources in two different ways:

1. Using a `for...of` loop with an array (`a`):
```javascript
for (const x of a) {
  if(x.channelId == "1208720602043654192") {
    passed.push(x);
  }
}
```
2. Using an `if` statement inside a `for...of` loop with an array (`b`):
```javascript
for (const x of b) {
  if(x.channelId == "1208720602043654192") {
    passed2.push(x);
  }
}
```
**Options compared:**

Two options are being compared:

1. Using a `for...of` loop with an array (`a`) and filtering the results using an `if` statement.
2. Using an `if` statement inside a `for...of` loop with an array (`b`).

**Pros and Cons:**

**Option 1 (using `for...of` loop with array `a`):**

Pros:

* Faster execution due to the optimized iteration mechanism of `for...of` loops.
* Simplified code, as the filtering logic is directly applied to the array.

Cons:

* May not be suitable for large datasets or complex filtering conditions, as it can lead to slower performance due to the overhead of the `if` statement.

**Option 2 (using `if` statement inside a `for...of` loop with array `b`):**

Pros:

* Allows for more flexibility in filtering logic, making it suitable for large datasets or complex filtering conditions.
* Can be faster than Option 1 for simple filtering cases, as the iteration is not optimized.

Cons:

* Slower execution due to the overhead of the `if` statement and the additional iteration over the array.
* More complex code, as the filtering logic is separate from the iteration loop.

**Other considerations:**

* The benchmark definition does not include any library or framework-specific optimizations, so the results should be applicable to general JavaScript environments.
* There are no mentions of special JavaScript features or syntax in this benchmark, so it's likely that the test cases will run on modern JavaScript engines without any issues.

**Alternatives:**

Other alternatives for similar benchmarks could involve testing other iteration mechanisms, such as:

1. Using `forEach` instead of `for...of`.
2. Using a simple loop with an index variable instead of a `for...of` loop.
3. Using a different data structure, such as a linked list or a hash table.

However, these alternatives would likely require significant changes to the benchmark definition and test cases to ensure that the results are comparable.

Related benchmarks:

uwu345 (version: 0)

essa

Comparing performance of: essa1 vs uwu2

Created: 2 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

essa1

uwu2

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):