Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Ramada - Vanilla Comparison
(version: 0)
Capitalize
Comparing performance of:
Vanila JS vs Ramada
Created:
2 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/ramda/0.27.1/ramda.min.js"></script>
Script Preparation code:
var text = 'lorem ipsum dolor sit amet';
Tests:
Vanila JS
function capitalize(text) { return text.charAt(0).toUpperCase() + text.slice(1).toLowerCase(); } var result = capitalize(text);
Ramada
const capitalize = R.when( R.is(String), R.pipe(R.toLower, R.replace(/^./, R.toUpper)), ); var result = capitalize(text);
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Vanila JS
Ramada
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
Run details:
(Test run date:
2 years ago
)
User agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/121.0.0.0 Safari/537.36
Browser/OS:
Chrome 121 on Mac OS X 10.15.7
View result in a separate tab
Embed
Embed Benchmark Result
Test name
Executions per second
Vanila JS
10761601.0 Ops/sec
Ramada
929924.9 Ops/sec
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided benchmark definition and test cases. **Benchmark Definition** MeasureThat.net is testing two approaches to capitalize a string: "Vanilla JS" (native JavaScript) and "Ramada". The benchmark definition includes: * A script preparation code that defines a variable `text` with an initial value of `'lorem ipsum dolor sit amet'`. * An HTML preparation code that links to the Ramda library. **Options Compared** The two options being compared are: 1. **Vanilla JS**: This approach uses native JavaScript functions (e.g., `charAt`, `toUpperCase`, `toLowerCase`) to capitalize the input string. 2. **Ramada**: This approach uses the Ramda library, which provides a functional programming style for transforming data. In this case, it uses the `R.when` and `R.pipe` functions to create a transformation pipeline that first converts the input to lowercase using `R.toLower`, then replaces the first character with its uppercase equivalent using `R.replace`, and finally applies `R.toUpper` to the remaining characters. **Pros and Cons** * **Vanilla JS**: + Pros: Easy to understand, no external dependencies required. + Cons: May be slower due to the overhead of function calls and object lookups. * **Ramada**: + Pros: Can be more efficient due to optimized function implementations and caching. Provides a declarative programming style that can lead to better performance and readability. + Cons: Requires an external dependency (the Ramda library), which may add latency. **Library - Ramda** Ramda is a functional programming library for JavaScript. Its primary purpose is to provide a set of higher-order functions that allow you to compose and transform data in a declarative way. In the context of this benchmark, Ramda is used to create a transformation pipeline that applies various operations to the input string. **Special JS Feature/Syntax** There are no special JavaScript features or syntax mentioned in the benchmark definition. Both test cases use standard JavaScript functions and constructs. **Other Alternatives** If you wanted to implement the `capitalize` function using other approaches, here are some alternatives: 1. **Regular expressions**: You could use a regular expression to match the first character of the input string and apply uppercase formatting to it. 2. **Template literals**: You could use template literals to concatenate an uppercase version of the first character with the remaining characters of the input string. 3. **String.prototype.toUpperCase** and String.prototype.toLowerCase**: You could use these methods to convert the input string to uppercase and lowercase, respectively, before concatenating them. Keep in mind that these alternatives may have different performance characteristics compared to the native JavaScript approach or the Ramda pipeline.
Related benchmarks:
ramdajs contains
Lodash vs rama vs pure
Lodash vs Ramda fromPairs
Lodash vs Ramda vs Native fromPairs
Ramda vs Vanilla test
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?