Benchmark: _.merge vs _.assign vs _.reduce vs JS reduce vs Js assign

HTML Preparation code:


<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.5/lodash.min.js'></script>

Script Preparation code:

var array = Array(1000).fill().map((_, index) => ({
    [(Math.random() + 1).toString(36).substring(2)]: index
}))

Tests:

Lodash merge
_.merge({}, ...array)
Lodash assign
_.assign({}, ...array)
Js reduce
array.reduce((acc, item) => ({...acc, ...item}), {})
Js assign
Object.assign({}, ...array)
_.reduce
_.reduce((acc, item) => ({...acc, ...item}), {})

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
Lodash merge
Lodash assign
Js reduce
Js assign
_.reduce

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 2 years ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/122.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 122 on Mac OS X 10.15.7

View result in a separate tab

_.reduce

5.9M/s

Js assign

33K/s

Lodash assign

10K/s

Lodash merge

9K/s

Js reduce

21/s

View exact numbers

Test name	Executions per second
✓ _.reduce	5,850,542 Ops/sec
Js assign	33,492 Ops/sec
Lodash assign	10,086 Ops/sec
Lodash merge	8,989 Ops/sec
Js reduce	21 Ops/sec

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's dive into the world of JavaScript microbenchmarks!

**Benchmark Overview**

The provided JSON represents a benchmark that compares four different approaches to merge or manipulate an array in JavaScript:

1. `_.merge` from Lodash
2. `_.assign` from Lodash
3. `array.reduce((acc, item) => ({...acc, ...item}), {})`
4. `Object.assign({}, ...)`

**Approaches Compared**

The four approaches are compared in terms of performance. The benchmark creates an array with 1000 objects, each containing a random property with a unique value. The approaches then merge or manipulate this array to produce a new object.

* `_`. `merge` and `_.assign` are two functions from the Lodash library that perform deep merging of objects.
* `array.reduce((acc, item) => ({...acc, ...item}), {})` uses the `reduce` method on the array to merge the objects. This approach accumulates the result by reducing the array to a single object.
* `Object.assign({}, ...)`, also known as the "spread operator" or "rest operator," is used to create a new object with the merged properties.

**Pros and Cons of Each Approach**

1. **Lodash `merge` and `_assign`**:
	* Pros: These functions are highly optimized for performance and provide a robust way to merge objects.
	* Cons: They require an external library (Lodash), which may not be desirable for small projects or those with size constraints.
2. **`array.reduce`**:
	* Pros: This approach is lightweight and doesn't require any external libraries.
	* Cons: It can be slower due to the overhead of the `reduce` method, especially for large arrays.
3. **`Object.assign`** (spread operator):
	* Pros: This approach is simple, lightweight, and widely supported across browsers and Node.js environments.
	* Cons: It may not work as expected if the input array contains non-objects or if the objects have different property types.

**Other Considerations**

When choosing an approach, consider the following factors:

* Performance: If speed is critical, Lodash `merge` and `_assign` are likely to be faster.
* Size constraints: If you're working on a project with size constraints, using an external library like Lodash might not be feasible.
* Browser support: If you need to support older browsers, the spread operator (`Object.assign`) may not work as expected.

**Library Used (if applicable)**

In this benchmark, two libraries are used:

1. **Lodash**: Provides the `merge` and `_assign` functions used in the benchmark.
2. **No external library is required for the `array.reduce` approach**, which uses only built-in JavaScript features.

**Special JS Features/Syntax**

None of the approaches use special JavaScript features or syntax that would impact their performance or behavior. The benchmark focuses on comparing well-established methods for merging and manipulating arrays in JavaScript.

_.merge vs _.assign vs _.reduce vs JS reduce vs Js assign (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: `Lodash merge vs Lodash assign vs Js reduce vs Js assign vs _.reduce`

Created: 2 years ago by: Guest

Go to the latest result

Lodash merge

Lodash assign

Js reduce

Js assign

_.reduce

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

_.merge vs _.assign vs _.reduce vs JS reduce vs Js assign (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: Lodash merge vs Lodash assign vs Js reduce vs Js assign vs _.reduce

Created: 2 years ago by: Guest

Go to the latest result

Lodash merge

Lodash assign

Js reduce

Js assign

_.reduce

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

Related benchmarks

Comparing performance of: `Lodash merge vs Lodash assign vs Js reduce vs Js assign vs _.reduce`