Benchmark: string-interpolation-vs-concatenation-vs-concatenation-with-interpolation-1

Script Preparation code:

var luckyNumber = Math.round(Math.random() * 100);

Tests:

string-interpolation
`SomeString: your lucky number for today is: ${luckyNumber}`
string-concatenation
'SomeString: your lucky number for today is: ' + luckyNumber
string-concatenation-with-interpolation
'SomeString:' + `your lucky number for today is: ${luckyNumber}`

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
string-interpolation
string-concatenation
string-concatenation-with-interpolation

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 2 years ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/122.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 122 on Mac OS X 10.15.7

View result in a separate tab

string-interpolation

32.1M/s

string-concatenation-with-interpolation

30.9M/s

string-concatenation

30.8M/s

View exact numbers

Test name	Executions per second
✓ string-interpolation	32,115,484 Ops/sec
string-concatenation-with-interpolation	30,898,936 Ops/sec
string-concatenation	30,769,544 Ops/sec

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's dive into the world of JavaScript microbenchmarks on MeasureThat.net.

**Benchmark Definition**

The benchmark definition represents a test case that measures the performance difference between three different approaches to string interpolation or concatenation in JavaScript:

1. `string-interpolation`
2. `string-concatenation` (without interpolation)
3. `string-concatenation-with-interpolation`

In this specific benchmark, each approach is tested by generating a random number and then interpolating or concatenating it into a string using the provided syntax.

**Options Compared**

Here are the three options compared in this benchmark:

1. **String Interpolation (`string-interpolation`)**
	* Use template literals (e.g., `SomeString:  your lucky number for today is: ${luckyNumber}`)
	* Pros:
		+ More readable and concise syntax
		+ Can be used with multiple variables
	* Cons:
		+ May have slightly slower performance due to the need to parse the template literals
2. **String Concatenation (`string-concatenation`)**
	* Use the `+` operator to concatenate strings (e.g., `'SomeString: ' + luckyNumber`)
	* Pros:
		+ Fast and efficient, as it avoids the overhead of parsing template literals
	* Cons:
		+ Can lead to unreadable code if not used carefully
3. **String Concatenation with Interpolation (`string-concatenation-with-interpolation`)**
	* Use a combination of `+` operator and template literals (e.g., `'SomeString:' + `your lucky number for today is: ${luckyNumber}``)
	* Pros:
		+ Offers a compromise between readability and performance
	* Cons:
		+ May not be as concise or readable as string interpolation

**Library Used**

In this benchmark, no specific library is used. The tests are executed in the context of a standard JavaScript environment.

**Special JS Features/Syntax**

None of the test cases explicitly use any special JavaScript features or syntax beyond what's required for the benchmark itself (e.g., template literals).

**Other Considerations**

When choosing between these approaches, consider the following:

* **Readability**: If readability is more important than performance, string interpolation might be a better choice.
* **Performance**: If you need to optimize for speed, string concatenation without interpolation might be the way to go.
* **Convenience**: String concatenation with interpolation offers a balance between readability and performance.

**Alternatives**

If you're interested in exploring alternative approaches, here are some options:

1. **ES6 spread operator (`...`)**: This can be used for simple string interpolation or concatenation.
2. **Function injection**: You can define functions that take variables as arguments and return formatted strings.
3. **String formatting libraries**: Libraries like Moment.js or a custom implementation can provide more advanced formatting options.

Keep in mind that the specific choice of approach depends on your project's requirements, performance constraints, and personal coding style preferences.

string-interpolation-vs-concatenation-vs-concatenation-with-interpolation-1 (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: `string-interpolation vs string-concatenation vs string-concatenation-with-interpolation`

Created: 2 years ago by: Guest

Go to the latest result

string-interpolation

string-concatenation

string-concatenation-with-interpolation

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

string-interpolation-vs-concatenation-vs-concatenation-with-interpolation-1 (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: string-interpolation vs string-concatenation vs string-concatenation-with-interpolation

Created: 2 years ago by: Guest

Go to the latest result

string-interpolation

string-concatenation

string-concatenation-with-interpolation

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

Related benchmarks

Comparing performance of: `string-interpolation vs string-concatenation vs string-concatenation-with-interpolation`