Toggle navigation
MeasureThat
.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
Feature Requests
FAQ
Register
Log In
Function or if function
(version: 0)
Benchmark.js
Comparing performance of:
If before function vs function call
Created:
2 years ago
by:
Guest
Go to the latest result
Tests:
If before function
const normalize = (v) => { return '0x' + v } let color = '0xffffffff' if(!color.startsWith('0x')) { color = normalize(color) }
function call
const normalize = (v) => { if(v.startsWith('0x')) { return v } else { return '0x' + v } } let color1 = '0xffffffff' color1 = normalize(color1)
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
If before function
function call
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
Run details:
(Test run date:
2 years ago
)
User agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/605.1.15 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/15.3 Safari/605.1.15
Browser/OS:
Safari 15 on Mac OS X 10.15.7
View result in a separate tab
Embed
Embed Benchmark Result
If before function
61.4M/s
function call
50.8M/s
View exact numbers
Test name
Executions per second
✓
If before function
61,432,980 Ops/sec
function call
50,760,796 Ops/sec
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's dive into the world of JavaScript microbenchmarks. **Benchmark Overview** MeasureThat.net allows users to create and run JavaScript benchmarks, comparing different approaches to optimize their code. In this case, we have two individual test cases: "If before function" and "function call". **Test Case 1: "If before function"** The benchmark definition for this test case is as follows: ```javascript const normalize = (v) => { return '0x' + v; } let color = '0xffffffff' if (!color.startsWith('0x')) { color = normalize(color) } ``` This code defines a function `normalize` that takes a string `v` and returns the same string prefixed with `'0x'`. The test case then creates a variable `color` initialized with the string `'0x' + 'ffffff'`. The benchmark is designed to measure how many times the condition `!color.startsWith('0x')` evaluates to `true`, which would cause the function call to execute. **Test Case 2: "function call"** The benchmark definition for this test case is as follows: ```javascript const normalize = (v) => { if (v.startsWith('0x')) { return v; } else { return '0x' + v; } } let color1 = '0xffffffff' color1 = normalize(color1) ``` This code defines the same `normalize` function as before, but with a slight twist. The test case creates two variables: `color1` and another unused variable ( likely added to fill the space). This is because MeasureThat.net expects a more complex benchmark definition which usually includes multiple functions or more complex logic. **Options Compared** The two test cases compare two different approaches: 1. "If before function": The condition `!color.startsWith('0x')` evaluates to `true`, causing the function call to execute. 2. "function call": The function is called directly, regardless of the condition. **Pros and Cons** * "If before function": + Pros: Can potentially reduce function calls, which can lead to performance improvements. + Cons: May introduce unnecessary overhead due to the conditional evaluation. * "function call": + Pros: Directly tests the performance of the function itself, without any potential overhead from conditionals. + Cons: May result in more function calls than necessary, potentially leading to increased overhead. **Library and Special JS Features** There are no notable libraries or special JS features used in these benchmark definitions. The code is relatively simple and focuses on demonstrating the difference between two approachess. **Other Considerations** * MeasureThat.net also considers other factors when running benchmarks, such as browser version, device platform, operating system, and executions per second. * The `RawUAString` field in the latest benchmark result provides additional information about the browser being tested. **Alternatives** If you want to create a similar benchmark or experiment with different approaches, here are some alternatives: 1. Browser benchmarking tools like Speedometer 2 or HTML5 Benchmark. 2. Online JavaScript compilers like CodeSandbox or Repl.it. 3. Local development environments like Node.js or a custom web server. Keep in mind that the specific approach and tools used may vary depending on your goals, experience level, and target audience.
Related benchmarks
Switch vs If else CNC
Switch vs Functional Approach 3
call vs if
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?