Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Lodash template VS JS Replace
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
Lodash template vs JS Replace
Created:
2 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.21/lodash.min.js'></script>
Script Preparation code:
var testString = 'We demystify ${variable1} porn and ${variable2} alternative sexuality ${variable3} authentic kinky porn and bondage videos. Experience the other side of porn with Kink.' var params = { variable1: 'value1', variable2: 'value2', variable3: 'value3' };
Tests:
Lodash template
_.template(testString)(params);
JS Replace
let replaced = testString; Object.keys(params).forEach(key => { replaced = replaced.replaceAll(`\$\{${key}\}`, params[key]); });
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Lodash template
JS Replace
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
Run details:
(Test run date:
11 months ago
)
User agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:140.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/140.0
Browser/OS:
Firefox 140 on Mac OS X 10.15
View result in a separate tab
Embed
Embed Benchmark Result
Test name
Executions per second
Lodash template
45754.1 Ops/sec
JS Replace
1421552.4 Ops/sec
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided benchmark definition and test cases. **Benchmark Definition:** The benchmark measures the performance of two approaches for rendering template strings: 1. **Lodash Template**: Using Lodash's `template` function to render a template string with dynamic variables. 2. **JS Replace**: Using JavaScript's built-in `replaceAll` method (in combination with regular expressions) to replace placeholders in the template string. **Script Preparation Code:** The script preparation code defines a test string (`testString`) and an object (`params`) containing variable values to be used for rendering the template string. **Html Preparation Code:** The HTML preparation code includes a reference to Lodash's `lodash.min.js` library, which is loaded into the browser. **Individual Test Cases:** There are two individual test cases: 1. **Lodash Template**: The benchmark definition uses Lodash's `template` function to render the template string with dynamic variables. 2. **JS Replace**: The benchmark definition uses JavaScript's built-in `replaceAll` method to replace placeholders in the template string. **Options Compared:** The benchmark compares two options: * **Lodash Template**: Using a library-specific approach for rendering template strings. * **JS Replace**: Using a browser-specific, built-in method for replacing placeholders. **Pros and Cons:** **Lodash Template:** Pros: * Easy to use and maintain, as it leverages a well-established library (Lodash). * Can be more readable and efficient for complex template strings. Cons: * Adds an external dependency (Lodash) that may not be present in all environments. * May incur additional overhead due to the library's initialization and lookup processes. **JS Replace:** Pros: * No external dependencies, making it suitable for environments where Lodash is not available or supported. * Uses a built-in method, which can be more efficient since it doesn't require any additional setup or initialization. Cons: * May be less readable due to the use of regular expressions and `replaceAll` method. * Can be slower in certain scenarios, especially when dealing with complex template strings. **Other Considerations:** When choosing between these options, consider the following factors: * **Performance:** JS Replace might be faster for simple cases, but Lodash Template might outperform it for more complex templates or those that require additional logic. * **Readability and Maintainability:** Lodash Template is generally easier to read and maintain due to its concise syntax and library support. * **Compatibility:** If the benchmark will run in environments where Lodash is not available, JS Replace becomes a more suitable option. **Libraries and Features:** The test case uses the following library: * **Lodash**: A popular JavaScript utility library that provides various functions for string manipulation, template rendering, and more. In this case, it's used for its `template` function. There are no special features or syntax mentioned in the benchmark definition that require specific attention or expertise.
Related benchmarks:
eval vs Function vs lodash.template
eval vs Function vs lodash.template v2
eval vs Function vs lodash.template v3
lodash noop vs new function vs optional chaining
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?