Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
trigata
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
native vs alt vs alt2 vs al3
Created:
8 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
function rand(min, max) { return Math.floor(Math.random() * (max - min + 1)) + min; } function angle(x, y) { let result = Math.atan(y / x); if (x < 0) { result += Math.PI; } else if (y < 0) { result += 2 * Math.PI; } return result; } function angle2(x, y) { if (x == 0) return (y == 0) ? 0 : (y > 0 ? Math.PI/2 : -Math.PI/2) var atan_xy = Math.atan(y / x) if (x > 0) return atan_xy else // x < 0 return atan_xy + (y < 0 ? -Math.PI : Math.PI) } function myAtan2(a, b) { var atan2val; if (b > 0) { atan2val = Math.atan(a/b); } else if ((b < 0) && (a >= 0)) { atan2val = Math.atan(a/b) + Math.PI; } else if ((b < 0) && (a < 0)) { atan2val = Math.atan(a/b) - Math.PI; } else if ((b = 0) && (a > 0)) { atan2val = Math.PI / 2; } else if ((b = 0) && (a < 0)) { atan2val = 0 - (Math.PI / 2 ); } else if ((b = 0) && (a = 0)) { atan2val = 1000; } return atan2val; }
Tests:
native
var xO = rand(1, 1000); var yO = rand(1, 1000); Math.atan(yO, xO);
alt
var xT = rand(1, 1000); var yT = rand(1, 1000); angle(xT, yT);
alt2
var xD = rand(1, 1000); var yD = rand(1, 1000); angle2(xD, yD);
al3
var xC = rand(1, 1000); var yC = rand(1, 1000); myAtan2(xC, yC);
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (4)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
native
alt
alt2
al3
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided benchmark definition and test cases. **Benchmark Definition** The benchmark measures the performance of three different implementations of the `atan` function in JavaScript: 1. `Math.atan(yO, xO)`: This is the native implementation of `atan` in JavaScript. It uses a single call to `Math.atan2(yO, xO)` under the hood. 2. `angle(xT, yT)`: This is an alternative implementation of `atan` defined by the author. It calculates the tangent and then applies the correct quadrant adjustment manually. 3. `angle2(xD, yD)`: Similar to `angle`, but uses a different method to calculate the result. 4. `myAtan2(xC, yC)`: This is another implementation of `atan` that takes into account the signs of both coordinates. **Options compared** The benchmark compares the performance of these four implementations: * Native implementation (`Math.atan(yO, xO)`) * Alternative implementation 1 (`angle(xT, yT)`) * Alternative implementation 2 (`angle2(xD, yD)`) * Custom implementation (`myAtan2(xC, yC)`) **Pros and Cons** Here are some pros and cons of each approach: * **Native implementation (`Math.atan(yO, xO)`)**: + Pros: Built-in function, likely optimized for performance + Cons: May not be as efficient as custom implementations due to overhead of calling a built-in function * **Alternative implementation 1 (`angle(xT, yT)`)**: + Pros: Simple and easy to understand + Cons: Manual quadrant adjustment can lead to errors if not implemented correctly * **Alternative implementation 2 (`angle2(xD, yD)`)**: + Pros: Similar to alternative implementation 1 but with a different method for calculating the result + Cons: Same limitations as alternative implementation 1 regarding manual quadrant adjustment * **Custom implementation (`myAtan2(xC, yC)`)**: + Pros: Can be optimized specifically for this benchmark and may outperform native or alternative implementations + Cons: Requires more code and potentially more maintenance effort **Library** There is no explicit library mentioned in the provided code. However, it's worth noting that `Math.atan2` is a built-in JavaScript function that uses the `atan` function from the math library. **Special JS feature or syntax** The benchmark does not explicitly use any special JavaScript features or syntax. **Other alternatives** If you're interested in exploring alternative implementations of the `atan` function, here are some options: * **Bourgeat's atan2**: This is a high-performance implementation of `atan2` that has been optimized for various platforms. * **Fast Atan2**: Another high-performance implementation of `atan2` that uses techniques like SIMD instructions to accelerate calculations. Keep in mind that these alternatives may have different trade-offs regarding performance, complexity, and maintainability compared to the custom implementation provided.
Related benchmarks:
trigata
trigata
trigata
trigata
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?