Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Array.prototype.concat vs spread operator
(version: 0)
Compare the new ES6 spread operator with the traditional concat() method
Comparing performance of:
lodash merge vs object.assign
Created:
8 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.5/lodash.min.js'></script>
Tests:
lodash merge
var a = { a: 'oh', b: 'my' }; var b = { c: 'goddess' }; var c = _.merge(a, b);
object.assign
var a = { a: 'oh', b: 'my' }; var b = { c: 'goddess' }; var c = Object.assign(a, b);
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
lodash merge
object.assign
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
I'll break down the explanation into manageable chunks. **Benchmark Overview** The benchmark compares two approaches to merging objects: `Object.assign()` and the spread operator (introduced in ES6). The goal is to determine which method is faster, more efficient, or reliable for object merging. **Options Compared** 1. **`Object.assign()`**: This method takes multiple arguments (object(s) to be merged into another object) and returns a new object containing all the properties from the input objects. 2. **Spread Operator (`...`)**: This syntax allows you to merge two or more objects by using the spread operator in an assignment expression, e.g., `const result = { ...a, ...b };` **Pros and Cons** 1. **`Object.assign()`**: * Pros: More widely supported across older browsers (IE 9+), easier to read and write, and works with any number of input objects. * Cons: Can be slower than the spread operator due to its overhead in creating a new object. 2. **Spread Operator (`...`)**: * Pros: Faster, more concise, and modern syntax that's gaining widespread adoption. * Cons: Less supported across older browsers (mostly only Chrome 59+), might not work as expected with certain libraries or frameworks. **Library Used** In the provided benchmark code, `lodash` is used in one of the test cases. Lodash is a popular JavaScript library that provides utility functions for tasks like object merging (`_.merge()`). The use of Lodash here helps ensure consistent results across different browsers and environments. **Special JS Features or Syntax** The spread operator (introduced in ES6) allows for concise and expressive syntax, making code easier to read and write. However, its usage might be unfamiliar to developers who are not familiar with modern JavaScript features. **Other Alternatives** If you need to merge objects without using `Object.assign()` or the spread operator, other alternatives include: 1. **`.concat()`**: Although deprecated in favor of the spread operator, `.concat()` can still be used for merging arrays. 2. **`Array.prototype.reduce()`**: This method can be used to merge objects by reducing them into a single object using a custom callback function. Keep in mind that these alternatives might have different performance characteristics and readability compared to `Object.assign()` and the spread operator. I hope this explanation helps!
Related benchmarks:
Array.prototype.concat vs spread operator vs lodash concat
Array.prototype.concat vs spread operator vs lodash.concat - variable and constant
Array concat vs spread operator vs push (many)
Adam - Array concat vs spread operator vs push
Array.prototype.concat vs spread operator (fix)
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?