Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
querySelector vs getElementsByClassName
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
querySelector vs getElementsByClassName
Created:
8 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<div class="test"></div>
Tests:
querySelector
document.querySelectorAll(".test")
getElementsByClassName
document.getElementsByClassName("test")
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
querySelector
getElementsByClassName
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
gemma2:9b
, generated one year ago):
This benchmark compares the performance of two methods in JavaScript for selecting HTML elements: `document.querySelectorAll()` and `document.getElementsByClassName()`. **Options Compared:** * **`document.querySelectorAll(".test")`:** This method uses CSS selectors to select all elements with the class "test". It returns a static NodeList object, which is a live collection of elements that updates automatically when the DOM changes. * **Pros:** More flexible and powerful as it allows using various CSS selectors (not just classes), efficient for selecting many elements. * **Cons:** Can be slightly slower than `getElementsByClassName()` if you only need to select elements by class. * **`document.getElementsByClassName("test")`:** This method specifically selects all elements with the given class name ("test"). It returns a static HTMLCollection object, which is also a live collection of elements that updates automatically when the DOM changes. * **Pros:** More performant if you only need to select elements by class. Simpler syntax. * **Cons:** Less flexible than `querySelectorAll()` as it only works with class names. **Considerations:** * **Specificity:** If your use case involves selecting elements based on various attributes or nesting, `querySelectorAll()` offers more flexibility and power. * **Performance:** For simple selection by class name, `getElementsByClassName()` might be slightly faster. However, the performance difference is often negligible in real-world scenarios. * **Code Clarity:** Sometimes `getElementsByClassName()` provides a clearer and more concise syntax if you only need to select elements by class. **Alternatives:** Besides these two methods, you can also use other techniques for selecting HTML elements: * `getElementById()`: To select an element with a specific ID. * Directly accessing elements in the DOM using their index or parent-child relationships. Remember that the best approach depends on the specific context of your code and the complexity of the selection criteria you need to implement.
Related benchmarks:
querySelector() vs getElementsByClassName()[0]
querySelector vs getElementsByClassName()[0]
getElementsByClassName()[0] vs querySelectorAll
querySelector vs getElementsByClassName [0] with extra
querySelector vs getElementsByClassName My
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?