Benchmark: set to array spread

Script Preparation code:

var mySet = new Set()
for (let i = 0; i < 999; i += 1) {
	mySet.add(i)
}

Tests:

spread
const myArr = [...mySet]
concat
const myArr = Array.from(mySet)

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
spread
concat

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

No previous run results

This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one to run it!

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's break down the provided benchmark and explain what is being tested.

**What is being tested?**

The benchmark measures the performance of creating an array from a Set object using two different methods: `Array.from()` and array spread (`...` operator).

**Options compared**

There are two options being compared:

1. **`Array.from(mySet)`**: This method creates a new array by calling the `from()` function on the Set object, passing it as an argument.
2. **`myArr = [...mySet]`**: This is the spread operator syntax, which creates a new array by copying all elements from the Set object into a new array.

**Pros and cons of each approach**

1. **`Array.from(mySet)`**:
	* Pros: More explicit and readable way to create an array from a Set. It's also more flexible, as it allows for additional options (e.g., `map()`, `filter()`).
	* Cons: May have overhead due to the function call.
2. **`myArr = [...mySet]`**:
	* Pros: More concise and efficient way to create an array from a Set. It's also faster, as it avoids the overhead of the `from()` function call.
	* Cons: Less readable and less flexible than `Array.from()`. The spread operator can also lead to unexpected behavior if not used carefully.

**Library and purpose**

The `Set` object is a built-in JavaScript library that provides a collection of unique values. It's implemented as an instance of the `Map` class, which means it uses a hash table to store its elements.

In this benchmark, the Set object is created using the `Script Preparation Code`, and then used to create arrays using both methods.

**Special JS feature or syntax**

There isn't any special JavaScript feature or syntax being tested in this benchmark. However, it's worth noting that the spread operator (`...`) has been a part of ECMAScript since ES6 (2015), while `Array.from()` was introduced in ES2019 (2017).

**Other alternatives**

In theory, other methods could be used to create arrays from Sets, such as:

1. `myArr = mySetToArray(mySet)`: A custom function that converts a Set to an array.
2. `myArr = [...new Set(...)]`: This method creates a new Set from the spread operator and then converts it to an array.

However, these alternatives are not tested in this benchmark, and the results might vary depending on the implementation and optimizations used by the browser or JavaScript engine.

Overall, this benchmark provides a simple yet insightful comparison of two common ways to create arrays from Sets in JavaScript.

Related benchmarks:

set to array spread (version: 0)

yoyo

Comparing performance of: spread vs concat

Created: 8 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

spread

concat

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

No previous run results

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):