Benchmark: concat vs push vs spread performance(more data)

Tests:

Concat
var a = [ "hello", true, 7, "hello", true, 7, "hello", true, 7, "hello", true, 7, "hello", true, 7, "hello", true, 7, "hello", true, 7, "hello", true, 7, "hello", true, 7, "hello", true, 7, "hello", true, 7, "hello", true, 7, "hello", true, 7, "hello", true, 7, "hello", true, 7, "hello", true, 7, "hello", true, 7, "hello", true, 7, "hello", true, 7, "hello", true, 7, "hello", true, 7, "hello", true, 7, "hello", true, 7, "hello", true, 7, "hello", true, 7, "hello", true, 7, "hello", true, 7, "hello", true, 7, "hello", true, 7, "hello", true, 7, "hello", true, 7, "hello", true, 7, "hello", true, 7, "hello", true, 7, "hello", true, 7 ]; var b = [ 1, 2, 1, 2, 1, 2, 1, 2, 1, 2, 1, 2, 1, 2, 1, 2, 1, 2, 1, 2, 1, 2, 1, 2, 1, 2, 1, 2, 1, 2, 1, 2, 1, 2, 1, 2, 1, 2, 1, 2, 1, 2, 1, 2, 1, 2, 1, 2, 1, 2, 1, 2, 1, 2, 1, 2, 1, 2, 1, 2, 1, 2, 1, 2, 1, 2 ]; var c = a.concat(b);
Spread operator
var a = [ "hello", true, 7, "hello", true, 7, "hello", true, 7, "hello", true, 7, "hello", true, 7, "hello", true, 7, "hello", true, 7, "hello", true, 7, "hello", true, 7, "hello", true, 7, "hello", true, 7, "hello", true, 7, "hello", true, 7, "hello", true, 7, "hello", true, 7, "hello", true, 7, "hello", true, 7, "hello", true, 7, "hello", true, 7, "hello", true, 7, "hello", true, 7, "hello", true, 7, "hello", true, 7, "hello", true, 7, "hello", true, 7, "hello", true, 7, "hello", true, 7, "hello", true, 7, "hello", true, 7, "hello", true, 7, "hello", true, 7, "hello", true, 7, "hello", true, 7, "hello", true, 7, "hello", true, 7 ]; var b = [ 1, 2, 1, 2, 1, 2, 1, 2, 1, 2, 1, 2, 1, 2, 1, 2, 1, 2, 1, 2, 1, 2, 1, 2, 1, 2, 1, 2, 1, 2, 1, 2, 1, 2, 1, 2, 1, 2, 1, 2, 1, 2, 1, 2, 1, 2, 1, 2, 1, 2, 1, 2, 1, 2, 1, 2, 1, 2, 1, 2, 1, 2, 1, 2, 1, 2 ]; var c = [ ...a, ...b ]
Push
var a = [ "hello", true, 7, "hello", true, 7, "hello", true, 7, "hello", true, 7, "hello", true, 7, "hello", true, 7, "hello", true, 7, "hello", true, 7, "hello", true, 7, "hello", true, 7, "hello", true, 7, "hello", true, 7, "hello", true, 7, "hello", true, 7, "hello", true, 7, "hello", true, 7, "hello", true, 7, "hello", true, 7, "hello", true, 7, "hello", true, 7, "hello", true, 7, "hello", true, 7, "hello", true, 7, "hello", true, 7, "hello", true, 7, "hello", true, 7, "hello", true, 7, "hello", true, 7, "hello", true, 7, "hello", true, 7, "hello", true, 7, "hello", true, 7, "hello", true, 7, "hello", true, 7, "hello", true, 7 ]; var b = [ 1, 2, 1, 2, 1, 2, 1, 2, 1, 2, 1, 2, 1, 2, 1, 2, 1, 2, 1, 2, 1, 2, 1, 2, 1, 2, 1, 2, 1, 2, 1, 2, 1, 2, 1, 2, 1, 2, 1, 2, 1, 2, 1, 2, 1, 2, 1, 2, 1, 2, 1, 2, 1, 2, 1, 2, 1, 2, 1, 2, 1, 2, 1, 2, 1, 2 ]; var c = a.push(...b);

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
Concat
Spread operator
Push

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 2 years ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/121.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 121 on Windows

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
Concat	8177031.0 Ops/sec
Spread operator	6484919.5 Ops/sec
Push	5741475.0 Ops/sec

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

I'll provide the answer without skipping any necessary steps.

To compare the performance of `Concat`, `Spread operator`, and `Push` methods in JavaScript, we need to analyze the benchmark results provided.

Here are the results for each method:

1. **Concat**:
	* Browser: Chrome 121
	* DevicePlatform: Desktop
	* OperatingSystem: Windows
	* ExecutionsPerSecond: 8177031.0
2. **Spread operator**:
	* Browser: Chrome 121
	* DevicePlatform: Desktop
	* OperatingSystem: Windows
	* ExecutionsPerSecond: 6484919.5
3. **Push**:
	* Browser: Chrome 121
	* DevicePlatform: Desktop
	* OperatingSystem: Windows
	* ExecutionsPerSecond: 5741475.0

Based on these results, the performance order from best to worst is:

1. `Concat` (8177031.0 executions per second)
2. `Spread operator` (6484919.5 executions per second)
3. `Push` (5741475.0 executions per second)

The `Concat` method appears to be the fastest, followed by the `Spread operator`, and then the `Push` method. However, it's essential to consider that these results might vary depending on the specific use case and input data.

Please note that this analysis is based solely on the provided benchmark results and may not reflect real-world scenarios or different JavaScript environments.

Related benchmarks:

concat vs push vs spread performance(more data) (version: 0)

Compare the new ES6 spread operator with the traditional concat() method and push

Comparing performance of: Concat vs Spread operator vs Push

Created: 2 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

Concat

Spread operator

Push

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one year ago):