Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
innerhtml vs removechild vs remove vs textContent
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
innerHTML vs removeChild vs remove vs textContent
Created:
2 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
HTML Preparation code:
<div id="container"></div>
Script Preparation code:
var node = document.getElementById('container'); for(var i = 0; i < 1000; i++) node.appendChild(document.createElement('div'));
Tests:
innerHTML
var node = document.getElementById('container'); node.innerHTML = '';
removeChild
var node = document.getElementById('container'); while(node.firstChild) node.removeChild(node.firstChild)
remove
var node = document.getElementById('container'); while(node.firstChild) node.firstChild.remove()
textContent
var node = document.getElementById('container'); node.textContent = '';
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (4)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
innerHTML
removeChild
remove
textContent
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
Run details:
(Test run date:
2 years ago
)
User agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/605.1.15 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/17.2.1 Safari/605.1.15
Browser/OS:
Safari 17 on Mac OS X 10.15.7
View result in a separate tab
Embed
Embed Benchmark Result
Test name
Executions per second
innerHTML
12893257.0 Ops/sec
removeChild
14556511.0 Ops/sec
remove
14600804.0 Ops/sec
textContent
12871568.0 Ops/sec
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
**Benchmark Overview** The provided benchmark, "innerhtml vs removechild vs remove vs textContent", tests the performance of four different approaches for clearing or resetting an HTML element's content. **Test Cases** Each test case is defined in the `Individual Test Cases` section. There are four test cases: 1. **innerHTML**: Clears the element's innerHTML property. 2. **removeChild**: Removes all child nodes from the element and then clears its own content. 3. **remove**: A syntax error, likely intended to be `removeNode()` or similar, which is not a standard JavaScript method for removing an element from the DOM. (More on this later.) 4. **textContent**: Sets the element's textContent property. **Library** None of the test cases explicitly use any external libraries, but they do rely on the `document` object and HTML elements, which are part of the Web API. **Special JS Feature or Syntax** Test case 3, **remove**, is an unusual syntax that does not exist in standard JavaScript. It's possible that this was a typo or an experimental feature that was never intended for production use. **Comparison** The test cases compare the performance of clearing or resetting an HTML element's content using different methods: * `innerHTML`: A simple and efficient way to clear the element's content. * `removeChild` and `textContent`: More complex approaches that involve removing child nodes and then setting the textContent property. **Pros and Cons** Here are some pros and cons of each approach: * **innerHTML**: Pros: Simple, fast, and widely supported. Cons: Can be slow for very large elements or multiple elements with large content. * `removeChild` and `textContent`: Pros: More efficient than `innerHTML` for large elements or multiple elements. Cons: More complex, slower, and less widely supported. **Other Alternatives** Some alternative approaches that could have been tested include: * Using the `innerHTML` property to set a string value, followed by parsing and manipulating the HTML. * Using a library like jQuery or other DOM manipulation libraries to clear or reset the element's content. * Testing different browser-specific features, such as WebKit's `removeChild()` method or Firefox's `textContent` property. **Benchmark Results** The latest benchmark results show that: * `remove` is not a valid syntax and likely causes errors or crashes in browsers. * `innerHTML`, `removeChild`, and `textContent` have different performance characteristics, with `remove` being the slowest due to its invalid syntax.
Related benchmarks:
innerhtml vs removechild vs remove! (few child nodes)
innerhtml vs removechild vs remove vs innerText vs textContent
innerhtml vs innerText vs removechild vs remove!
innerhtml vs removechild(firstChild) vs removechild(lastChild) vs innerText vs replaceChildren()
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?