Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
if else vs switch case vs indexOf 2
(version: 0)
Comparing performance of:
if vs switch vs indexOf
Created:
2 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Script Preparation code:
var X = 2; var arr = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5];
Tests:
if
if (X > 10) { } else { }
switch
switch (X) { case 1: break; case 2: break; default: }
indexOf
arr.indexOf(X);
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (3)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
if
switch
indexOf
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
Run details:
(Test run date:
2 years ago
)
User agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/123.0.0.0 Safari/537.36
Browser/OS:
Chrome 123 on Windows
View result in a separate tab
Embed
Embed Benchmark Result
Test name
Executions per second
if
6655070.5 Ops/sec
switch
6471815.5 Ops/sec
indexOf
3277840.5 Ops/sec
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the provided benchmark and explain what's being tested. **Benchmark Overview** The benchmark measures the performance of three different conditional statements in JavaScript: 1. `if` statement 2. `switch` statement 3. `indexOf()` method (which is not a true conditional statement, but rather an array method) **Options Compared** The benchmark compares the performance of these three options: * `if` statement with a simple comparison (`X > 10`) * `switch` statement with multiple cases (only one case matches the value of `X`, which is 2) * `indexOf()` method on an array (`arr.indexOf(X)`) **Pros and Cons of Each Approach** 1. **If Statement**: * Pros: Simple, easy to understand, and widely supported. * Cons: May be slower due to the overhead of evaluating a boolean expression. 2. **Switch Statement**: * Pros: Can be faster than an `if` statement for multiple cases, but may require more code. * Cons: May not be suitable for complex cases or large numbers of options. 3. **IndexOf() Method**: * Pros: Optimized for array methods and can be faster in some cases. * Cons: Not a true conditional statement, as it searches for the value within an array. **Library Used** In this benchmark, no specific library is used beyond the standard JavaScript functions (`indexOf()` method). **Special JS Features or Syntax** The `switch` statement uses the `default` clause to specify what happens when none of the cases match. This feature is widely supported in modern JavaScript engines. **Benchmark Preparation Code** The provided script preparation code sets two variables: `X` and `arr`, where `X` is set to 2 and `arr` is an array containing five elements. **Other Alternatives** If you're considering alternative approaches, here are a few options: * **Ternary Operator (`?:`)**: This can be faster than an `if` statement for simple cases. * **Loops**: Using loops (e.g., `for` or `while`) to iterate over an array can be slower than array methods like `indexOf()`. * **Regular Expressions**: If you need to perform a more complex search, regular expressions might be a good option. Keep in mind that the performance differences between these approaches may vary depending on the specific use case and JavaScript engine.
Related benchmarks:
JS find vs indexOf
find vs findIndex vs for in (Array prototype methods)
JS typed strict find vs indexOf
find vs indexOf (Array prototype methods)
JS find vs arr[indexOf ]
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?