Toggle navigation
MeasureThat.net
Create a benchmark
Tools
Feedback
FAQ
Register
Log In
Array.prototype.concat vs spread operator
(version: 0)
Compare the new ES6 spread operator with the traditional concat() method
Comparing performance of:
Array.prototype.concat vs spread operator
Created:
8 years ago
by:
Guest
Jump to the latest result
Tests:
Array.prototype.concat
var params = [ "hello", true, 7 ]; var clone = [ ...params ]; clone.push({something: 'new'});
spread operator
var params = [ "hello", true, 7 ] var clone = params.concat([{something: 'new'}])
Rendered benchmark preparation results:
Suite status:
<idle, ready to run>
Run tests (2)
Previous results
Fork
Test case name
Result
Array.prototype.concat
spread operator
Fastest:
N/A
Slowest:
N/A
Latest run results:
No previous run results
This benchmark does not have any results yet. Be the first one
to run it!
Autogenerated LLM Summary
(model
llama3.2:3b
, generated one year ago):
Let's break down the benchmark and its test cases. **What is being tested?** The provided JSON represents two individual test cases that compare the performance of two approaches for creating a new array: 1. `Array.prototype.concat()`: This method creates a new array by concatenating an existing array with another array or array-like object. 2. The **new ES6 spread operator** (`[ ...params ]`): This syntax creates a new array by spreading the elements of an existing array. **Options compared** The two test cases are comparing the performance of these two approaches for creating a new array: * `Array.prototype.concat()` * The new ES6 spread operator (`[ ...params ]`) **Pros and Cons of each approach:** 1. **`Array.prototype.concat()`** * Pros: + Widely supported across browsers and platforms. + Allows for more control over the resulting array, such as using a `concat()` callback function to modify the new array. * Cons: + Can be slower than the spread operator due to the overhead of calling a method and creating a new array. 2. **The new ES6 spread operator (`[ ...params ]`)* * Pros: + Fast and efficient, as it only requires creating a new array reference without modifying an existing one. + More concise and expressive code. * Cons: + May not be supported in older browsers or platforms. **Special JS feature/syntax:** The spread operator (`[ ...params ]`) is a relatively recent addition to JavaScript, introduced in ECMAScript 2015 (ES6). It's part of the new syntax features that allow for more concise and expressive array creation. **Library usage:** There are no libraries used in these test cases. The benchmark tests only the native JavaScript implementations of `Array.prototype.concat()` and the spread operator. **Other considerations:** When evaluating performance, it's essential to consider factors such as: * Browser version support * Platform dependencies (e.g., desktop vs. mobile) * Execution frequency and concurrency **Alternatives:** For creating a new array, other methods can be used, such as: * `Array.from()`: Creates a new array from an iterable or array-like object. * `Array.prototype.push()` with an initial value: Creates a new array by pushing elements onto the existing array. However, these alternatives may have different performance characteristics compared to the spread operator and `concat()`, which is why this benchmark specifically compares those two approaches.
Related benchmarks:
concat 2 arrays: Array.prototype.concat vs spread operator
Array.prototype.concat vs spread operator (fix)
Array.prototype.concat vs spread operator real
Array.prototype.concat vs spread operator on large array
Array.prototype.concat vs spread operator on small array
Comments
Confirm delete:
Do you really want to delete benchmark?